[QUOTE=TIC;1542321]
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
the only reason anyone uses the floyd-canelo comparison is because they have both reached a level of fame and stardom where they can now play the a-side game

canelo risked his 0 against the best fighter in the sport at the time, take up the scorecard with cj

every other fighter doesn't take on real risks and not many clean out divisions. i wish artur or bivol had of picked of that weak calf to unify

canelo's legend will continue to grow
Bivol unified the titles which takes a lot of political and financial manoeuvring. Callum Smith has won the super middleweight tournament.

Canelo has had the alphabet boys roll over for him whereas other fighters do not have that luxury.
explain bivol unified the titles. callum got a gift against ryder, sounds like he got some advantages, and the tournament didn't even have fighters like james d, gilberto or david b, the dirrell's or even eubank and juergen was forced out

I meant Beterbiev. My error.

Callum had a close fight with Ryder but that should not detract away from him winning the tournament. Eubank lost to Groves and the other fighters chose not to enter. Callum took the risk and won.