Blubber 2, Physique 0

[TitoFan]

Interesting huh?

First Joshua gets his ass handed to him by the Mexican Pillsbury doughboy.

Then equally chiseled albeit a few pounds lighter Wilder gets stomped by the jiggly Gypsy King.

Sure..... Joshua got some measure of revenge.

But it was only after Ruiz decided to eat his way through training camp and go for the FAT record probably held by Butterbean.



There appears to be a lesson here.

So Adam Kownacki take heart. There might be room at the top for you yet.

Getting a bit desperate now. Is this your third thread calling Joshua a loser for not fighting Wilder.



"George Washington, Daniel Boone, Neil Armstrong, Davey Crockett, You boy took one Hell of a beating"

Yeah, that's it. You called it. I'm desperate.

By the way, I've reread my post on this thread several times over and I'm still trying to see where I called Joshua a loser for not fighting Wilder (on THIS THREAD).

Maybe you can lend me your magic bifocals so I can see what you see.

Actually i do need bi-focals but when i am not wearing contacts and need to read i just put my bins on my head Much cheaper.

But back to your point. You made it quite clear that YOU thought Joshua only won the rematch because Ruiz came in even fatter and then suggested that Fury was fat as though suddenly now the reverse of what you claimed is true. Make your mind up. One minute not being Mr Universe is why you lose and then all of a sudden it is why you win. It almost seems you are bending over backwards to avoid giving the two British boxers any credit.

You get so twisted up in your own convoluted logic it's a miracle you don't end up with your head up your own ass.

First you said I called Joshua a loser in this thread. Now you seem to be ignoring that lapse of judgment and are off in some rant, where you're claiming I said Joshua only won the Ruiz rematch because Ruiz came in fatter.

Take a deep breath and slow down there, sport.

Don't take your vitriol into the boxing boards too.