Who is the rest of the forum?
Who is the rest of the forum?
I never called you a benefits scrounger, because I would be astounded if considering the years you have wasted on here, you would be willing to put in the effort needed to pick up a pen.
And you don't want a discussion at all. You hector and berate, mock and look down your nose with derision at anyone like Kirkland who has the decency and patience to indulge your teenage bullshit.
Last edited by El Kabong; 03-06-2020 at 07:07 PM.
I work harder than you ever have because I don't have a trust fund to lean on. That though has nothing to do with this thread or your being an apologist for a swamp filler. It is amazing that you like Gandalf think that it is everyone else that lacks decency as you top the forum up with more hate every day.
Do you now? And how much do I have in my trust fund? Since of course you KNOW I have one.
You could fill several libraries with what you don't know or understand about America and the politics in America.
Why bring Gandalf up? You're talking to ME or shall the entire forum gather around and read your fucking lecture together?
I wouldn't bring up the benefits scrounger deal if you hadn't accused me of being some trust fund receiving ne'er-do-well. Can't tell you how far off base you are with that, but hey....I guess you just want to build me into a caricature that you can potshot at your leisure.....by all means see how that works out for you.
Paul Krugman has a long track record of being right about economics. He was right about the 2008 meltdown, predicting it in 2005. He's been right about every twist and turn of the economy since the 2008 meltdown too but you wouldn't know because you don't read anything he writes and don't understand anything about economics. The thing you posted here proves my point. This quote is from an article he wrote in the nineties for a series of light hearted articles for which NYT writers were asked to come up with predictions about the future about a subject they didn't normally cover for the Times that they thought would be proved wrong in time. Flying cars and so on.
Somebody chopped this piece out of the article to fool all the ignorant easily fooled motherfuckers out there. There's a whole industry out there of people producing misleading crap to make Krugman look bad and that's because he's been so accurate about the economic events of the last few decades and all the economists on the conservative side of the argument have had decades of theories and predictions shredded to bits by the events of the past couple of decades to the extent that they don't ever talk about economics anymore. Seriously, right wing/conservative/free market economists don't actually produce any work anymore. They either just repeat stuff that has been comprehensively disproved by events or more sensibly shut the fuck up.
Krugman also predicted an immediate recession/depression if Trump was elected.
Not quite working out as he thought, yet again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks