Impeachment

[Gandalf]

Who is the rest of the forum?

[Beanz]

Who is the rest of the forum?

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

[El Kabong]

Again you asking for the right to no reply just like your pussy president. Those are not the terms of engagement. The forum is not a safe space for you and Gandalf to be indulged in indefinitely.

Not quite. I'm asking for a discussion which you don't want because YOU want the right of no reply.

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

I guess when you're a benefits scrounger everyone looks like Daddy Warbucks.

[Beanz]

Again you asking for the right to no reply just like your pussy president. Those are not the terms of engagement. The forum is not a safe space for you and Gandalf to be indulged in indefinitely.

Not quite. I'm asking for a discussion which you don't want because YOU want the right of no reply.

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

I guess when you're a benefits scrounger everyone looks like Daddy Warbucks.

I never called you a benefits scrounger, because I would be astounded if considering the years you have wasted on here, you would be willing to put in the effort needed to pick up a pen.

And you don't want a discussion at all. You hector and berate, mock and look down your nose with derision at anyone like Kirkland who has the decency and patience to indulge your teenage bullshit.

[El Kabong]

Again you asking for the right to no reply just like your pussy president. Those are not the terms of engagement. The forum is not a safe space for you and Gandalf to be indulged in indefinitely.

Not quite. I'm asking for a discussion which you don't want because YOU want the right of no reply.

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

I guess when you're a benefits scrounger everyone looks like Daddy Warbucks.

I never called you a benefits scrounger, because I would be astounded if considering the years you have wasted on here, you would be willing to put in the effort needed to pick up a pen.

And you don't want a discussion at all. You hector and berate, mock and look down your nose with derision at anyone like Kirkland who has the decency and patience to indulge your teenage bullshit.

Heh.... Now who is confused?

I'm calling YOU a benefits scrounger.

Kirkland has neither decency nor patience. Kirkland is a giant fan of Paul Krugman, the economic font of knowledge who has been wrong about absolutely EVERYTHING. Example...

[Beanz]

I work harder than you ever have because I don't have a trust fund to lean on. That though has nothing to do with this thread or your being an apologist for a swamp filler. It is amazing that you like Gandalf think that it is everyone else that lacks decency as you top the forum up with more hate every day.

[El Kabong]

I work harder than you ever have because I don't have a trust fund to lean on.

Do you now? And how much do I have in my trust fund? Since of course you KNOW I have one.

That though has nothing to do with this thread or your being an apologist for a swamp filler.

You could fill several libraries with what you don't know or understand about America and the politics in America.

It is amazing that you like Gandalf think that it is everyone else that lacks decency as you top the forum up with more hate every day.

Why bring Gandalf up? You're talking to ME or shall the entire forum gather around and read your fucking lecture together?

I wouldn't bring up the benefits scrounger deal if you hadn't accused me of being some trust fund receiving ne'er-do-well. Can't tell you how far off base you are with that, but hey....I guess you just want to build me into a caricature that you can potshot at your leisure.....by all means see how that works out for you.

[Gandalf]

I work harder than you ever have because I don't have a trust fund to lean on. That though has nothing to do with this thread or your being an apologist for a swamp filler. It is amazing that you like Gandalf think that it is everyone else that lacks decency as you top the forum up with more hate every day.

But tell the truth, you likely claimed benefits. I suspect it is one reason you avoided marriage for 2 decades. Seen that before.

[Kirkland Laing]

Again you asking for the right to no reply just like your pussy president. Those are not the terms of engagement. The forum is not a safe space for you and Gandalf to be indulged in indefinitely.

Not quite. I'm asking for a discussion which you don't want because YOU want the right of no reply.

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

I guess when you're a benefits scrounger everyone looks like Daddy Warbucks.

I never called you a benefits scrounger, because I would be astounded if considering the years you have wasted on here, you would be willing to put in the effort needed to pick up a pen.

And you don't want a discussion at all. You hector and berate, mock and look down your nose with derision at anyone like Kirkland who has the decency and patience to indulge your teenage bullshit.

Heh.... Now who is confused?

I'm calling YOU a benefits scrounger.

Kirkland has neither decency nor patience. Kirkland is a giant fan of Paul Krugman, the economic font of knowledge who has been wrong about absolutely EVERYTHING. Example...

Paul Krugman has a long track record of being right about economics. He was right about the 2008 meltdown, predicting it in 2005. He's been right about every twist and turn of the economy since the 2008 meltdown too but you wouldn't know because you don't read anything he writes and don't understand anything about economics. The thing you posted here proves my point. This quote is from an article he wrote in the nineties for a series of light hearted articles for which NYT writers were asked to come up with predictions about the future about a subject they didn't normally cover for the Times that they thought would be proved wrong in time. Flying cars and so on.



Somebody chopped this piece out of the article to fool all the ignorant easily fooled motherfuckers out there. There's a whole industry out there of people producing misleading crap to make Krugman look bad and that's because he's been so accurate about the economic events of the last few decades and all the economists on the conservative side of the argument have had decades of theories and predictions shredded to bits by the events of the past couple of decades to the extent that they don't ever talk about economics anymore. Seriously, right wing/conservative/free market economists don't actually produce any work anymore. They either just repeat stuff that has been comprehensively disproved by events or more sensibly shut the fuck up.

[El Kabong]

Krugman also predicted an immediate recession/depression if Trump was elected.

Not quite working out as he thought, yet again.

[Gandalf]

Who is the rest of the forum?

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

That's what people on forums do. They interact. I have fought with all of them in times past. It is called growing up. You are the perennial adolescent.