Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Beanz View Post
Unlike you, i don't suck Murdoch's cock so i don't have to read any warnings.


This is just you stamping your feet and demanding that people be outraged like the Politically Correct Corporate boot licking arsehole you have always been.
Thought you said the warning labels were Murdoch's idea so he wouldn't be sued?

Quote Originally Posted by Beanz View Post
Ha!

So they are still showing them but including a legal disclaimer because Murdoch doesn't want to be sued or something?

If I support Political Correctness why would I oppose the warning labels?


Are you having trouble comprehending this Beanz?


I believe in what Mark Twain said “Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it.”
Unlike you I don't buy the Sun, watch Fox or subscribe to Sky. So I don't have to read the bloke you supports warnings. The fact remains though that the films are still available unedited. Nobody is telling you that you can't deep throat as much prime beefcake as you want.

And still you seem to be forgetting that being politically correct is not just something misused by people on the left. Right Wing prissy nutjobs like you are just as bad. Here you are in all seriousness as a staunch defender of decidedly anti Christian hyper capitalism insisting that a private subscription company should be prevented from deciding to include a warning before an unedited film, purely because you personally are so pathetic, you are offended by some words on screen.

The irony is delicious.