Sky Race Warnings on movies

[Memphis]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

[Beanz]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

[Gandalf]

Yes, not even showing Little Britain which is soft stuff is the same as book burning. It hurts nobody and many more enjoy than are bothered by it. Always give people choice over nannying.

[Mark TKO]

Amazing how threads turn out.

The world is fucked - my opinion. And when threads like this go this way thats even more evidence it is.

I'm offended

[Memphis]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

[Beanz]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.



But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.

So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?


You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.


Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"


You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

[Beanz]

Dread to think what 'Buck Burning' is

[El Kabong]

@Beanz I would like to apologize personally to you, I'm sorry.


I'm sorry that I feel as though people are developed enough to enjoy entertainment without extra warnings added onto other warnings. I'm sorry I feel as though art (film included) should be allowed to be viewed without preparing people to brace for an assumed emotional impact. I apologize because I can understand and even appreciate satire and comedy. I was unaware that humorless bureaucrats knew better than me. You have truly opened my eyes to this, thank you.


May we all one day have the emotional intelligence quotient of Beanz here. We should be so lucky to open our eyes every morning and see naught but Nazis and Racists.


Sincerely,


El Kabong

[Fenster]

Started to watch The Sopranos from scratch the other day, funk me, it's hilarious how racist the characters are. Anyone with half a brain cell understands the joke is on the ignorant meatheads not the people being stereotyped.

We've got to a point where imbeciles feelings are more important than facts/knowledge/humour.

[Memphis]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.

No. I read the replies and by the looks of things, took them exactly as they were intended. A harmless 'isn't this daft' opening post and further isn't this daft comments. If anyone is inferring something, it's you.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.
I don't care about every post you make. I don't care if you're outraged or not. The point was very simple. If anyone is outraged, it's you.


But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.
"No films were banned during the making of this thread" And no one ever thought they were.
So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?
​No. You didn't make up what people said. You just deliberately misconstrued it to make your point. You've now been told you got it wrong. Many times.

You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

We'll agree to disagree.
I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.

I'm really not.
Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"

No, I didn't. Not a single bit. It was faux outrage to further mock the daftness of the point of the opening post.

You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

Hope this helps.

[El Kabong]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.

No. I read the replies and by the looks of things, took them exactly as they were intended. A harmless 'isn't this daft' opening post and further isn't this daft comments. If anyone is inferring something, it's you.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.
I don't care about every post you make. I don't care if you're outraged or not. The point was very simple. If anyone is outraged, it's you.


But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.
"No films were banned during the making of this thread" And no one ever thought they were.
So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?
​No. You didn't make up what people said. You just deliberately misconstrued it to make your point. You've now been told you got it wrong. Many times.

You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

We'll agree to disagree.
I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.

I'm really not.
Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"

No, I didn't. Not a single bit. It was faux outrage to further mock the daftness of the point of the opening post.

You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

Hope this helps.

[Beanz]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.

No. I read the replies and by the looks of things, took them exactly as they were intended. A harmless 'isn't this daft' opening post and further isn't this daft comments. If anyone is inferring something, it's you.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.
I don't care about every post you make. I don't care if you're outraged or not. The point was very simple. If anyone is outraged, it's you.


But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.
"No films were banned during the making of this thread" And no one ever thought they were.
So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?
​No. You didn't make up what people said. You just deliberately misconstrued it to make your point. You've now been told you got it wrong. Many times.

You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

We'll agree to disagree.
I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.

I'm really not.
Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"

No, I didn't. Not a single bit. It was faux outrage to further mock the daftness of the point of the opening post.

You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

Hope this helps.

I don't think you are angry mate, not one bit, but you seem to be very sure that i am, and so I can't really help you if you just want to make up an intention that just isn't there.


Gandlaf and El Kabong are not employing faux outrage either. " I apologize because I can understand and even appreciate satire and comedy"


Yes of course ..fucking hell



These are guys that would sign a petition to declare anyone describing themselves as anti-racist as a terrorist if they had the chance.


I just think that if a capitalist broadcaster wants to put warnings on the front of films they have the right to broadcast it is beyond ridiculous to pretend that is the same as censorship.

[El Kabong]

Gandlaf and El Kabong are not employing faux outrage either. [I]" I apologize because I can understand and even appreciate satire and comedy"

Yeah as in I don't think movies like 'Tropic Thunder' or 'Trading Places' are worthy of warnings. What the fuck did you think I meant?

These are guys that would sign a petition to declare anyone describing themselves as anti-racist as a terrorist if they had the chance.

Huh?

I just think that if a capitalist broadcaster wants to put warnings on the front of films they have the right to broadcast it is beyond ridiculous to pretend that is the same as censorship.

Tell me again about what YOU think of Murdoch

[Memphis]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.

No. I read the replies and by the looks of things, took them exactly as they were intended. A harmless 'isn't this daft' opening post and further isn't this daft comments. If anyone is inferring something, it's you.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.
I don't care about every post you make. I don't care if you're outraged or not. The point was very simple. If anyone is outraged, it's you.


But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.
"No films were banned during the making of this thread" And no one ever thought they were.
So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?
​No. You didn't make up what people said. You just deliberately misconstrued it to make your point. You've now been told you got it wrong. Many times.

You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

We'll agree to disagree.
I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.

I'm really not.
Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"

No, I didn't. Not a single bit. It was faux outrage to further mock the daftness of the point of the opening post.

You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

Hope this helps.

I don't think you are angry mate, not one bit, but you seem to be very sure that i am, and so I can't really help you if you just want to make up an intention that just isn't there.

I didn't say you were angry, I've no idea if you're angry or not, I'd hope not, it's just some words. I don't want any part of this desire to cause one another to be angry or upset. It's fucking weird.

You put forward this idea that 'most' in this thread were claiming that films we're being banned and outraged at such. All I'm saying, and all I have said, is that based on what's been posted, you appear to be the outraged one. Outraged at a position that doesn't exist.

[Spicoli]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

Cannot do all the quote select from mobile for some reason but Beanz mate I wasn’t thinking anything was banned other than Gone with the wind as pointed out. It was a rhetorical question hence running on about labels and editing.