Sky Race Warnings on movies

[Memphis]

Do I have to be making a point?

I was highlighting the warnings sky were putting on their movies if you read the fucking post.

Did I say you could no longer watch.

Started down a path that will see more films than not needing a warning

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned. Even you said 'everything has gone to fuck.'

What is really insane is pointing out people being tortured and imprisoned (including British Citizens) for refusing to censor stories etc and being told to shut up you SJW snowflake, and then those same people bursting into tears and stamping their feet over a warning before a bloody film ffs.

What a bunch of soft lads. Seriously lame.

What utter utter bullshit. Literally no one said anything was being banned.

You're outraged over outrage that doesn't exist. You've invented an argument to make an completely redundant point.

If you read anything other than 'these warnings are a bit daft' into the opening post then you got it wrong. Intentionally by the sounds of it.

Here we go. I am not outraged. Why would i be outraged by a load of middle aged blokes wanting to cry into their breakfast? You are full of shit mate.



if you think


"Burn it all down, just fuck everything" El Kabong

"Insane... the world is fucked" Mark TKO

"Movie Massacre" Tittyfan

"This is what happens when you start censoring free speech" Bruce Icke TIC

"I'm gonna miss "Trading Places" - TittyFan

"That may not be book burning, but it is certainly tearing out several pages 'for your own good'. This is a Communist/Fascist slippery slope." - Gladys



are examples of nobody being outraged or saying anything is being banned, then it seems you are the one inventing an argument to make a completely redundant point.


I did not misread Mark's Opening post. I just assume it was a given that most people would agree a lot of the warnings were unnecessary or misguided. I try to think the best of my fellow man but i log on here and it is like a time machine of grumpy old farts from the 70's. Don't tell me that Blazing Saddles and Zulu were brought by Al with perfectly innocent intentions...ha! and then look at the outrage in some of the other replies, both Spicoli and Tittyfan were under the mistaken impression that some of the films were actually banned.

If anything it is funny for me to read El Kabong get on his moral high horse when the bloke would shoot you for using certain words, and has a least a thousand threads with bullet points explaining who and what he would liked banned in mind numbingly boring detail. Gladys the same. Those two are so proud of their anti-wokeness worn as a badge of pride, it makes you worry that they might be seriously dangerous if there was not some issue for them to express counter-outrage over every day.

And yet you seemingly get to decide who is outraged? But god forbid anyone accuse you of the same? No one is crying into anything beanz. You invented the whole thing out of sheer arrogance.

You've taken a completely harmless thread and handful of comments and turned it into something it never was, based on a lie.

This, is a lie

I read the post but the immediate knee jerk over reaction of most was to assert that everything was being banned

Most? was that your issue? Surely you can't read the replies contained and not see that is what was being inferred. It's not court mate, its a forum.

No. I read the replies and by the looks of things, took them exactly as they were intended. A harmless 'isn't this daft' opening post and further isn't this daft comments. If anyone is inferring something, it's you.


I am personally judged to be outraged and angry in every post that i make (So much so, even you fall for it. ) so i can uinderstand why one should not jump to those conclusion.
I don't care about every post you make. I don't care if you're outraged or not. The point was very simple. If anyone is outraged, it's you.


But don't pretend that all these fellas quotes were just invented. That is literally what they said in order to either express their outrage, or the fact that they thought films were being banned.
"No films were banned during the making of this thread" And no one ever thought they were.
So you have people saying 'I'm going to miss this film' and 'are any of these films actually banned?' and you are now pretending that i made it up?
​No. You didn't make up what people said. You just deliberately misconstrued it to make your point. You've now been told you got it wrong. Many times.

You are just employing the very pendantry you are accusing me of.

We'll agree to disagree.
I am not going to say 'Take a chill pill you furious outraged angry mad bastard' because that would be utter and complete bollocks but it is what you are doing now.

I'm really not.
Are you seriously telling me you did not think any outrage was implied from GlamRolf and El Kabong comparing it to buck burning and claiming like Vivien Leigh "Burn it all down, just fuck everything"

No, I didn't. Not a single bit. It was faux outrage to further mock the daftness of the point of the opening post.

You could hardly express outrage any more succinctly.


They should be on the stage.

Hope this helps.

I don't think you are angry mate, not one bit, but you seem to be very sure that i am, and so I can't really help you if you just want to make up an intention that just isn't there.

I didn't say you were angry, I've no idea if you're angry or not, I'd hope not, it's just some words. I don't want any part of this desire to cause one another to be angry or upset. It's fucking weird.

You put forward this idea that 'most' in this thread were claiming that films we're being banned and outraged at such. All I'm saying, and all I have said, is that based on what's been posted, you appear to be the outraged one. Outraged at a position that doesn't exist.

[Mark TKO]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

[Memphis]

He should also apologise for Theophilus P Wildebeeste. Not for any race related matters. Just apologise man.

[Beanz]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

I already reread it twice mate. I am not accusing you of saying everything is banned or being outraged. There are plenty of posters here though who are outraged by the very idea of anything changing at all.

This thread demonstrates that stubborn intransigence very clearly. There is a big problem with racism in the UK and the US and this forum reflects that.

A lot of it is this insistence by many that there is no problem. Flat out denial. Then there is whataboutery and the forum favourite

'False Equivalence'

Lenny Henry has spoken for years now about regrets of being used as a political football, worse because he was little more than a child. Being part of the Black and White minstrels, feeling compelled to make jokes parodying himself and his race because he felt he had to do that to be accepted is nothing like equivalent to him playing a character disguising himself to avoid the mob in a film.

[Gandalf]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

I already reread it twice mate. I am not accusing you of saying everything is banned or being outraged. There are plenty of posters here though who are outraged by the very idea of anything changing at all.

This thread demonstrates that stubborn intransigence very clearly. There is a big problem with racism in the UK and the US and this forum reflects that.

A lot of it is this insistence by many that there is no problem. Flat out denial. Then there is whataboutery and the forum favourite

'False Equivalence'

Lenny Henry has spoken for years now about regrets of being used as a political football, worse because he was little more than a child. Being part of the Black and White minstrels, feeling compelled to make jokes parodying himself and his race because he felt he had to do that to be accepted is nothing like equivalent to him playing a character disguising himself to avoid the mob in a film.

True.

Is this a false equivalence? Will trigger warnings stop this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...in-park-attack

[Beanz]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

I already reread it twice mate. I am not accusing you of saying everything is banned or being outraged. There are plenty of posters here though who are outraged by the very idea of anything changing at all.

This thread demonstrates that stubborn intransigence very clearly. There is a big problem with racism in the UK and the US and this forum reflects that.

A lot of it is this insistence by many that there is no problem. Flat out denial. Then there is whataboutery and the forum favourite

'False Equivalence'

Lenny Henry has spoken for years now about regrets of being used as a political football, worse because he was little more than a child. Being part of the Black and White minstrels, feeling compelled to make jokes parodying himself and his race because he felt he had to do that to be accepted is nothing like equivalent to him playing a character disguising himself to avoid the mob in a film.

True.

Is this a false equivalence? Will trigger warnings stop this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...in-park-attack

Yes it is a good example of false equivalence and your seeming inability to act like an adult, get your own thoughts and room in order, or hide your own sick agenda driven insanity. There is simply no comparison with warning about portrayals of racism in films, however warranted or misguided, and a clearly mentally ill terrorist/criminal killing people as reported on by the very press you would without blinking lie and pretend never reported it.

False Equivalence.

You and El Kabong are among the most triggered people on the forum. It is an uncomfortable truth but you are like a pair of cats jumping in a frozen rigid trance of terror after seeing a cucumber. You do not even live in the UK or USA for fucks sake and yet your ability to be triggered is almost unrivaled.

[Mark TKO]

Seeing the length of some of these responses to make points make me glad I'm rarely 'triggered'

I prefer a simple "fuck you shit arse" or "when and where?"
Type response

[Spicoli]

Seeing the length of some of these responses to make points make me glad I'm rarely 'triggered'

I prefer a simple "fuck you shit arse" or "when and where?"
Type response

Pretty much this

[Gandalf]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

I already reread it twice mate. I am not accusing you of saying everything is banned or being outraged. There are plenty of posters here though who are outraged by the very idea of anything changing at all.

This thread demonstrates that stubborn intransigence very clearly. There is a big problem with racism in the UK and the US and this forum reflects that.

A lot of it is this insistence by many that there is no problem. Flat out denial. Then there is whataboutery and the forum favourite

'False Equivalence'

Lenny Henry has spoken for years now about regrets of being used as a political football, worse because he was little more than a child. Being part of the Black and White minstrels, feeling compelled to make jokes parodying himself and his race because he felt he had to do that to be accepted is nothing like equivalent to him playing a character disguising himself to avoid the mob in a film.

True.

Is this a false equivalence? Will trigger warnings stop this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...in-park-attack

Yes it is a good example of false equivalence and your seeming inability to act like an adult, get your own thoughts and room in order, or hide your own sick agenda driven insanity. There is simply no comparison with warning about portrayals of racism in films, however warranted or misguided, and a clearly mentally ill terrorist/criminal killing people as reported on by the very press you would without blinking lie and pretend never reported it.

False Equivalence.

You and El Kabong are among the most triggered people on the forum. It is an uncomfortable truth but you are like a pair of cats jumping in a frozen rigid trance of terror after seeing a cucumber. You do not even live in the UK or USA for fucks sake and yet your ability to be triggered is almost unrivaled.

White people killed in England is not like Black people killed in America. I am glad we agree.

So why are you so into statues being toppled in the UK over crimes in America?

[Gandalf]

I am getting hip to it. Yeah, only 'Black Lives Matter'. Of course it is different whence the different response. 🤯

All Lives Matter.

[Beanz]

You know I just read my opening post again. So should you Beanz.

I said about the warnings then said ‘fair enough’ but to have a look at some on the list where this might lead withe other films. I then said that the Aliens one was baffling. And here we are.

When is Lenny Henry going to apologise for True Identity ?

I already reread it twice mate. I am not accusing you of saying everything is banned or being outraged. There are plenty of posters here though who are outraged by the very idea of anything changing at all.

This thread demonstrates that stubborn intransigence very clearly. There is a big problem with racism in the UK and the US and this forum reflects that.

A lot of it is this insistence by many that there is no problem. Flat out denial. Then there is whataboutery and the forum favourite

'False Equivalence'

Lenny Henry has spoken for years now about regrets of being used as a political football, worse because he was little more than a child. Being part of the Black and White minstrels, feeling compelled to make jokes parodying himself and his race because he felt he had to do that to be accepted is nothing like equivalent to him playing a character disguising himself to avoid the mob in a film.

True.

Is this a false equivalence? Will trigger warnings stop this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...in-park-attack

Yes it is a good example of false equivalence and your seeming inability to act like an adult, get your own thoughts and room in order, or hide your own sick agenda driven insanity. There is simply no comparison with warning about portrayals of racism in films, however warranted or misguided, and a clearly mentally ill terrorist/criminal killing people as reported on by the very press you would without blinking lie and pretend never reported it.

False Equivalence.

You and El Kabong are among the most triggered people on the forum. It is an uncomfortable truth but you are like a pair of cats jumping in a frozen rigid trance of terror after seeing a cucumber. You do not even live in the UK or USA for fucks sake and yet your ability to be triggered is almost unrivaled.

White people killed in England is not like Black people killed in America. I am glad we agree.

So why are you so into statues being toppled in the UK over crimes in America?

Who said i am so into statues being toppled? I am not an ideologue like yourself, though of course you would like me to be. The toppling of Colston was fantastic and long overdue, but that does not make every statue fair game, or even suggest that all those toppling it even knew why they were doing it. It made a very good point. It exposed the hypocrites like you who for so long have tried to pretend that Empire as all sunlit uplands and giving things like civilization to the world. If you think paying compensation to the descendants of slave owners in the House of Lords or kicking down doors and deporting Brits who have been here for 50+ years , and the deaths of Black Brits at the hands of your mates in the Neo Nazi far right etc had nothing to do with why the BLM demonstrations resonated with decent Brits here, then you are even more deluded than we all thought.

It is primarily about solidarity and empathy and a respect for very basic decent human values, like the respect for life. That is what makes you and El Kabong attitudes so objectionable, and quite honestly disgusting, to myself and i am sure many others. There are many i am sure who would not touch these forums with a barge pole because of how accepted such sick thinking is here.

This forum is a hostile environment.

Look at how furious and angry you both were with the idea of me working with refugees and migrants as though that made me a terrorist sympathizer. Look at how you both try and define who you even consider British despite neither of you living here. So of course you are not going to understand how when other people saw George Floyd being killed they were far more concerned and justifiably outraged with the manner and callousness of his death then what country he lived in or what country through accident of birth he was born in. To you such solidarity is an anathema, and so it is no surprise why you are perplexed by peoples genuine outrage when yours is saved for bullshit that does not really matter.