Strong woman..label her a whore. Mm k. Good thing dating outside of an estranged marriage and open relationships let alone paying off porn starsisn't a disqualifier for men running for President eh.
Strong woman..label her a whore. Mm k. Good thing dating outside of an estranged marriage and open relationships let alone paying off porn starsisn't a disqualifier for men running for President eh.
A Flower of Chennai she is.
Why always politicized? what does Trump have to do with the point being made? Wait, I'll answer that for ya, cuz you won't:
ZILCH
Of course they did. Do not be so naive. Why do you think you are so infatuated with Trump? Because you think by supporting him it makes you a player. You think just like the people in council houses in the UK that voting for these wealthy go getting elite establishment bastards will mean some of that good luck and fortune will rub off on you. It doesn't work like that at all though.
Are you seriously still playing pretend and telling us all that you honestly think Trump never used everything at his disposal to whore himself his entire life in order to build upon and maintain his establishment status? That Orange cunt was never an outsider, he was born with a silver spoon up his arse, and yet has convinced you that somehow he is the outsider who has got were he is thru hard work and honesty, and yet some woman of colour born without his immense privilege is the one everyone should be pissed off at. That is disgusting but unfortunately just another routine example of how the elite Deep state establishment, that Trump has always been up to his neck in, has always treated everyone else. Do you want to be part of that or do you want to reject that?
Apples and Oranges? That is you entire debating style since day one. Ad hominem, Logical fallacies and red herrings left, right and centre. Look at this thread. For you it is about everyone else on earth but Trump.
So Trump doing those things earned him his nomination? Did you think about this or did my response just get you to emote the opposite of what I said?
Not quite. I mean I'd explain to you why I vote for Trump, but why should I when you already know all about it. I mean if you didn't where would you come up with half the stuff you post regarding me? It's not like you'd just dream some shit up right?
Is that so? Like I said "it's not like you'd just dream some shit up right?"
Being born wealthy isn't the same as being born politically connected. Trump hasn't held party membership of 1 party for all that long. And Trump may have brushed elbows with the rich & famous but he was never and will never be in the blue blood elite club....he's Rodney Dangerfield in Caddychack and how you don't comprehend that is beyond me. Trump isn't a Kennedy, he's not a Bush, he's not a Roosevelt, he's not a member of some wealthy POLITICAL family....he's a guy who inherited a bunch of money, made big time bucks, lost a shit ton of money and then gained it back.
Kamala Harris was still born into exceptional privilege. But hey I know full well I won't convince you of anything so you emote to your heart's content. Just scream at the world lil fella.
I guess you'll supply a few examples of those or? Yeah, that's right. Spicoli referenced Trump and I had a say on it. Or didn't you read that part? Or am I not allowed to respond....maybe next time you'll tell me the rules of how I should be allowed/expected to respond.
Church avenue in Brooklyn Lyle. 7 p.m. this Friday night. See you there
Lyle you have two appointments this week
2 p.m. Wednesday August 19th Zoom
7 p.m. Friday August 21st Brooklyn
Also simply quoting me on red herring and let them eat cake does not in any way nullify or invalidate the appropriateness of those two phrases when applied to a vast majority of your posting. I am not the only one who thinks it. Now Lyle you are being invited repeatedly as a fellow poster on a boxing site to join our Zoom.
It is hilarious that you are still doing this multi-quote breakdown bollocks. You are a walking cliche. At your age you should be embarrassed to be so predictable and stuck in the mud. It is 2020 and your very first comment about a black woman was to claim she slept her way into the position she finds herself in, and now you are pretending that somehow Trump is an outsider.
Trump is not only neck deep in with the establishment, he has dug in and expanded that swamp in a manner unlike anyone before him. To pretend otherwise is beyond ludicrous. You have bought into it all and invested so much in it that despite his making a mockery of you and your country, you have convinced yourself that you are wearing a really nice suit, when in reality you are already down to your long Johns, and even the Penny Farthing you think you are looking down at everyone from, is just a figment of your imagination.
If the format of my posts are so bothersome to you please provide a standardized template for how you'd like for me to respond so that just once perhaps I could avoid your bitching about it.Originally Posted by Beanz
Also that doesn't change the crux of what I posted which I see you've still no urge to actually answer.
Last edited by El Kabong; 08-18-2020 at 03:57 PM.
But again what relevance does an initial appointment...that's been rehashed and targeted for years..have to do with an instant disqualifier or an indicator of her 'whoring' and being incapable. Tell me was she appointed 4 times to elected office or was she actually elected repeatedly. It's almost as silly as saying had El Presidente not had millions loaned to him by Pop that he would have been incapable of making his empire on his own. Really though it's laughable to skirt around free passes, cronyism and nepotism and let Trump off as an angel. He's appointed, anointed and rewarded positions of power to many unqualified donors, TV anchors, associates and family for four years running. And I know a few votes he'll be receiving belong to some felons he's used the power of the office to overturn.
Bigger man George, bigger punch!
Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
Hidden Content
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks