Social Platform Vs. Media
Definition - What does Social Platform mean?
A social platform is a web-based technology that enables the development, deployment and management of social media solutions and services. It provides the ability to create social media websites and services with complete social media network functionality
Media:
the main means of mass communication (broadcasting, publishing, and the internet) regarded collectively.
Its' a business, if you don't like who they promote or reject, then don't buy/use it.
Today in America, the current Prez shows his true bitch-like qualities by crying & whimpering on what each prez went through: negative coverage.
So, how did the founding dudes deal with it?
General George read negative coverage on him depicted as a traitor. Thomas Jefferson was called a N-word lover , mean spirited and a lowlife. He helped to start National Gazette that attacked Hamilton.
Secretary of War Henry Knox brought a copy of the paper into a meeting called “The Funeral of George Washington” which described a tyrannical executive on a guillotine. The Aurora was published by Benjamin Franklin’s grandson, Benjamin Franklin Bache, made the paper a mission to “destroy undue impressions in favor of Mr. Washington.”
If old punk ass pumpkin-man had lived in that day, check out what was said about the 1st prez of USA:
The Aurora published an article claiming the 1st Prez was arrogant, stupid, loved monarchy, a lousy general, a lukewarm patriot, incompetent executive, & he was accused of intentionally undermining the U.S. Constitution. As one of their correspondents wrote: “If ever a nation was debauched by a man, the American nation has been debauched by WASHINGTON! . . . Let the history of the federal government instruct mankind that the mask of patriotism may be worn to conceal the foulest designs against the liberties of a people.”
A letter preserved of President Washington reveals IMO what a real man and leader would've said, I quote: "...this kind of representations is an evil which must be placed in opposition to the infinite benefits resulting from a free Press.”
In other words, he did not think he could or should declare war on it. He used free speech to compromise what he felt were lies to that of the truth, for if he felt he himself was the bearer of truth, then he is complicit in denying just that (free speech) to identify each own as to what was truth and what was false.
Now in USA we have a prez who flaunts his disdain for media on social platforms (coincidentally created by liberals) to execute the media as incompetent, fake & false. It seems as if he wants to ride ALL media that speaks ill of him.
Just consider the 1st time he accused media.
In 2016 it was FOX 
after Megyn Kelly questioned how he spoke on other's infidelity, but not his own. She was canned. And they became his launch pad. If FB or Twitter bans who the POTUS likes, they are accused of media bias in favor of an ideolog only (liberalism). If they acquiesce, then they are spared his verbal wrath.
And wherever tyrants ruled? Are the places where free speech was ruled a lie & there democracy and truth died.
All's lost! Everything's going to shit!
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: 
Reply With Quote
the one who Trump visited. meaning he can tell his worshippers to boycott FOX, then afterwards go hate Colbert...and that they did do.
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
Bookmarks