Re: Crawford vs Brook..14th Nov
No one will ever know the answer to this, but would Kell have made more money and be more successful if he never fought Triple G and continued defending his Welterweight title?
Kell may have eventually lost his title to Spence anyway but the fight was even until the later rounds and Brooks was winning the fight early. The damage caused by Triple G and first loss would have been a factor in this 2nd loss.
Kell would have made at least 1 defence which were normally against relatively poor opposition and probably poor money.
I do not think Kell would have ever beaten Spence, even if he never fought Golovkin, but may have lost by decision instead.
So in conclusion I do not think he would have made as much money defending his titles than he did against Golovkin and he would have lost to Spence anyway. He would have only made 1 extra successful defence.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks