Top 10 Signs the USA is totally dead, forever, and will collapse shortly

[SlimTrae]

Banana Republics beg to differ and demand an apology for being compared to the insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol.

I stand corrected! B- Republics aren't ran by liars perpetrating as a billionaire.
They don't send their followers to their state Capital...and when they reach out for Pardons, he pardoned himself. I hear B Republic leaders go down with the ship. Not jump it.
The Proud Boys, once staunch allies of Trump, are calling him a "shill" and "extraordinarily weak,"

"Trump will go down as a total failure," the Proud Boys said in a Telegram channel on Monday."

Looks as if the USA is totally dead. It may even get a 51st state, heaven help us, if Beijing Joe gets his way and then they will stack the court.

Beijing Joe will get himself into a war in the first 60 days unlike Trump who was the first president in a long long time not to start any new wars, but it matters very little considering that the USA is totally dead forever especially after the hijacking of the government in the treasonous act that occurred on November 3rd 2020 and the subsequent agent provocateurs and suppression of judiciary by the cultural marxists

You are Correct Drumpf didnt start any new wars, rather he took advantage of the current war - the unending war called the war on terror- where we were supposed to go on the offensive via Bush Doctrine. Never heard him condemn or repeal.
https://www.thoughtco.com/the-bush-doctrine-3310291

Trump: US, allies strike Syria to stop chemical weapons
https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-us-...emical-weapons

The 1st headline in the FIX, I mean FOX articles states: The United States, France and Britain launched military strikes in Syria.

New war, old war, launching strikes, covert, overt, all ends the same- we spend $ for military operations that places our troops in harm's way.


FOX further solidified the rationale: Trump said the U.S. is prepared to sustain pressure on Assad until he ends what the president called a criminal pattern of killing his own people with internationally banned chemical weapons.

Did he complete his mission? How do we know there aren't anymore chemical weapons if we or someone didnt go into investigate to ensure there weren't anymore, what then was the purpose?


I give him credit for obfuscating the issue of the use of drones-. When he CANCELLED DRONE STRIKE CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT- Great way to lie to his constituents & claim since we haven't given any new names to a war- no need to question the kill count.
Who needs transparency for drone strikes?
https://warontherocks.com/2019/04/tr...oes-it-matter/
On March 6, without explanation, President Donald Trump revoked an Obama-era rule requiring an annual public report on U.S. drone strikes, including civilian casualties.
https://www.theamericanconservative....seems-to-care/

According to the American Conservative, The Trump administration has significantly increased the tempo of drone strikes in a number of countries, and it has relaxed the rules governing the targeting of these strikes


According to the American Conservative, according to the Pentagon's numbers on troop deployments, I quote them:
The drone war in Somalia is just one part of this campaign, and it exemplifies what is wrong with the open-ended “war on terror.” Like the other wars he inherited, President Trump has significantly escalated it. Through the end of 2019, there had already been 148 U.S. strikes launched in Somalia since Trump took office. In just the first half of 2020, there have been as many U.S. drone strikes in Somalia (40) as there were between 2007 and 2016. In less than three and a half years, Trump has more than quadrupled the number of attacks in Somalia ordered by his last two predecessors.

https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/201...omalia/160339/

"The sound of a drone crescendoed in the air until a violent explosion occurred, killing five alleged civilians instantaneously. The intended target was a nearby vehicle purportedly associated with the al-Shabaab terrorist group."

So if the purported purpose was to go after a what? A terrorist group...how does that not mean...he is still continuing the war Obama NEVER started. The war he continued...that Dubya started?

Interesting that one can find quite a few articles on our war in Somalia from U.K, to Al Jazeera to even Switzerland's press, but for some reason not in America. Not the mainstream media, not the right wing media talks about the endless killing there.
The fact they whisper it shouldn't negate the fact- we are there. Not as missionaries.

True, he didnt start any new wars, but he did use my tax dollars to bomb a runway in 2017. Called the Shayrat missile strike. Remember? The one that got repaved in 48 hours, making me wonder what was the point of using our tax dollars for such a mission?

He is however the 1st president to sell our troops for cash. I wonder what is there mission in Arabia and why should we be okay with their mission? BTW what is their mission that Donnie Darko bragged about the amount of 1 billion dollars for their service....of what? Why he wanted to protect a nation he said himself- couldn't survive without us.



Secretary Mark Esper & Chairman Joint Chief Dunford are asked to make a comment, usually that means our military is being sent on a mission, but not for handing out bottles of water and MREs lol! Here is why they said troops were being sent under Donnie Darko
"In response to the President has approved the request of the deployment of U.S. Forces"

Please, stop for a second....if troops are being deployed to a country...it doesnt mean they are being sent for combat operations because there is no name affixed to the mission that we might say- Now this is a war? Does it really take naming it? We sent our troops there because of their oil facilities? Do you consider that a just mission? How so? Just interested in understanding your take.


I guess that was nice of him to order the reduction of troop from 4,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan down to 2,500........In November of 2020.
He asked: “What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,”

I acknowledge I give him no credit for requesting to close military bases (which I am in support of) because it comes across as stank ass hypocrisy when one party closes military bases under BRAC- they are getting us out of unnecessary wars. But if the other party does the same thing, using the SAME Base Realignment & Closure Act- where they are GUTTING OUT MILITARY.
When Democrats deal with Taliban they are against America, but when Donald did- FOX called it a Peace deal.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-mil...al-special-rep

The U.S. closed five military bases in Afghanistan as part of an agreement signed with the Taliban more than four months ago, a U.S. official confirmed to Fox News.

This is how he went about requesting it. It was supposed to be for rounds in 1988, 1991, 1993, 2002 I think...and a round in 2009 or Y2k10.
Bush was hailed for getting us out of areas using BRAC while Obama was shit talked like Clinton and labeled as cutting and gutting our military when they used BRAC.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3...-base-closures


Amazing how 3,000 troops were just sent...yet that doesn't mean we are involved in new wars...so the increase goes under the radar.

#FoxNews
US deploying 3,000 more troops to Middle East amid Iran tension- We took action to stop a war, not start one...Wow.
he didn't start any new wars, but he sure as hell kept our troops on constant deployments.

Biden, Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush have all sent our soldiers for missions that doesnt seem to be beneficial for America, yet somehow the people separate them per political party thus making one man sending troops to war as stopping wars, while the other is considered as destroying America with endless wars.