NO it is not crazy.
YES he is crazy.
YES you are crazy.
State it?
IT.
Is that what you were after?
First you have to ask why an Armenian/Italian/American living down in Texas is so worried about a 'PROPOSED' bill of law in California being presented as though it were news (Last March) by an Australian ex Football player who I assume does not live in California either.
Even more bizarre is how this Mainstream Murdock outrage addicted muppet is being presented as the voice of sanity when he has devoted a whole section on his show to what he calls 'Woke News'.
Over here in the UK most Toy shops are not divided into boys and girls toys anyway. They are put into groups so that you may have an aisle of dolls and another of board games and another of pushbikes etc and they are not separated by gender at all. It is a bit odd that supposedly in America they are. Most girls will choose to play with baby dolls and most boys will choose to play with action figures but actually there has always been a massive crossover and most kids will play with their other siblings toys regardless of gender.
The actress thing again is a classic case of him being desperate to virtue signal his own broflake credentials. He seems to be saying that an actress suggesting that the interviewers vacuous questions were a bit stupid was a perfect example of her being somehow offensive. It is so massively dishonest of him because there he was rolling his eyes at the same stupid questions, as though it were the actress' fault they were being asked. That was demonstrated he said, by her suggesting that to ask what she looks for in a man assumes her sexuality. Which it does.
He then caps off a whole section in which he has virtue signaled his own misogyny and basic untruthfulness by describing her as "A Shelia you have never heard of". Despite him saying she was an elite movie star?Which again sums up the section. Here is stuff nobody cares about but i want to use as an excuse to virtue signal my outrage.
Sad.
That is despite him claiming she was an expert on everything because of being in the Spiderman films ( something only he claimed not her) and having a title he unknowingly did not realise actually described himself perfectly
"ELITE SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS KNOWS NO BOUNDS".
He then rounds the section off by proving that not embracing the prescribed blue or pink based baby shower theme is enough to make the big nappy wearing prick cry and tear up his script to prove his broflake credentials.
Not every parent wants to know the sex of their child before birth, and baby showers are just commercial bullshit anyway. Being in Taupe or any other colour than pink or blue is not going to change that. Again nobody suggested unborn babies would be offended but he wishes that people had so he could again wave his virtue signalling prescribed anti PC bullshit around.
These guys
Like the long haired ginger prick too
are more embarrassing than the ultra PC fruitcakes they are trying to mock.
![]()


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


? yes or no. simply state it.
Which again sums up the section. Here is stuff nobody cares about but i want to use as an excuse to virtue signal my outrage.
That is despite him claiming she was an expert on everything because of being in the Spiderman films ( something only he claimed not her) and having a title he unknowingly did not realise actually described himself perfectly
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks