Re: Today In Biden Land

Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Yep, the way the media goes on you would swear he was tearing up nations like Bush. Really there was positive and negative there. Trump was complicated that way. Some will even call him weak or a lover of dictators for just trying to find middle ground. Obviously not true.
I just do not believe in the chemical attack narrative. Assad had nothing to gain by doing such a thing and he was in a decent position. Wish they would let Syria be and for Amerca to give up on the Middle East. It has cost trillions and done little except to profit those invested in death.
Let it be. Biden doing it this early while the nation is struggling is a twat.
I agree the mainstream media was all over him, while right wing media was backing him. Probably being vindictive for stating Barry O. never should've went in for 1,300 Syrians (without Congressional approval) But Ok for Donnie T. to go in for 40-80 Syrians depending on which sources-as Russia... if we remember told the United Nations they invited USA along to see if there were traces of chemical weapons used...here is their video- raising the issue, how did an airfield attack result in less than 80 killed, with a video showing them dousing babies with water. The toddlers, sleeping, like ain shit wrong, until ya'll soaked us!
He takes office in January 2017, correct sir? Less than 2 months on April 2017 he approved of launching 59 missiles aka Shayrat missile strike.
Rather than bomb where the chemicals were- just bomb the runways that were used (allegedly). Keep the bomb sites, just bomb runways & a few planes.
The strike was conducted without either U.S. congressional or United Nations Security Council approval.
He addressed his reasoning, I quote: "Asad choked out the lives of helpless woman, men and children. It was a slow and brutal death for so many. Even beautiful babies were cruely murdured in this very barbaric attack. No child of God should ever suffer such horror. It is in this vital national security interests of the United states to deter the spread."
What was wild is:
Hours after the U.S. missile strike, Syrian government's warplanes took off from the Shayrat base
They attributed the ability of the Syrian government to continue within 48 hours because US told Russia via the media they were going to attack their ally aka Syria.
Republican voters normally against war said the following:
Senator Mike Lee (R–UT) said, "President Trump should make his case in front of the American people and allow their elected representatives to debate the benefits and risks of further Middle East intervention to our national security interests.
Senator Rand Paul (R–KY) tweeted, "the United States was not attacked."
Representatives Justin Amash (R–MI) said, "Airstrikes are an act of war. Atrocities in Syria cannot justify a departure from Constitution,
Thomas Massie (R–KY) called it a "big mistake"
Former congressman Ron Paul argued there was "zero chance" that Assad had deliberately used chemical weapons, and called the attack a "false flag"
& Please remember two month ins he did 2 attacks. 1st one in Yemen, remember?:
His reply- "The military wanted to do it- Obama wanted to. They lost him. "
Republicans Said ‘No’ When Obama Wanted To Launch A Strike On Syria
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...clared/390618/
"Congress won't approve President Obama's proposed authorization of military force"
The White House, after a long delay, sent Congress a proposed authorization for the use of military force in February
"Will America Declare the War It's Already Fighting? Lawmakers immediately began picking apart President Obama's proposal for a resolution formally authorizing military force against ISIS."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ghting/385404/
1 attack for Obama within 2 months. 2 attacks within 2 months for Donnie 1 for Joey and counting... and some think there is a difference between both parties..
Last edited by SlimTrae; 03-01-2021 at 02:48 PM.
All's lost! Everything's going to shit!
Bookmarks