I am arguing on behalf of honesty and your argument is fundamentally dishonest. You as usual are cherry picking, moving the goal posts and deflecting in order to not admit you just jumped on the bandwagon instead of thinking for yourself.
Thanks: 4
Likes: 25
Dislikes: 0
Array
I am arguing on behalf of honesty and your argument is fundamentally dishonest. You as usual are cherry picking, moving the goal posts and deflecting in order to not admit you just jumped on the bandwagon instead of thinking for yourself.
Array
I don't think you are being honest if you do not think East Asians look Oriental and it somehow has to be purged. My honesty is in disagreeing with you and telling you that real East Asians I know are laugh at it even being an issue. There is nothing wrong with chopsticks, traditional clothing or eye shape. Kids will draw things the same way. I say this as a man who is attracted to the East.
Another case in point are the masks made by Koreans sold in Myeong Dong. They typically depict small eyes and do look a bit strange. Obviously they are a caricature. They look like this and I have bought such items as gifts. Is this racist because of the eye form and element of the grotesque? Should we ban them too? 'Darn squinty eyes' pleadeth Lord Beanz. 'Racist!'
http://www.antiquealive.com/store/de...ngban-Hahoetal
I just disagree with you and have pointed out that caricature works both ways and you even see it in government leaflets here. It does not matter.
Array
Yes, I know a sentence was a bit strange. Am on a phone and do not want to delete and post again. That mask lacks the chopsticks, but eyes are now apparently the issue.
Array
Again you are not being honest. Lets go back to the beginning.
A private company made a decision to stop publishing and reprinting 6 books anymore in a series created many years ago in order to avoid causing unnecessary offense and to respond to a changed world and market.
They are still reprinting and publishing the other 33 books in the series.
All your talk of banning and purging is not in anyway reflective of the reality of the situation.
You and Brock can pull whoever you like out of your red and white hat and pretend that their not being offended is relevant but it really isn't.
It is a marketing decision the company made because they believe those images to be offensive. When you read the entire story and take into account context etc across all six books, it actually makes perfect sense and is a rational reasonable moderate response.
Unlike yours and Brocks that pleads with everyone to join in your outrage.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks