I'd say the biggest contributors to the January 6th day of utter shame were the politicians, the so called attorneys and most of all all the hate radio stations, the right winged financed channels like NEWSMAX, OANN, FOX, SEAN INSANITY, DEAD RUSH that constantly claimed stolen election


Yet near the whole lot of their resources have done a 180 and once forced in a court to say- they were giving their opinions. Not facts.

How can those who believe the election was stolen- have no words for those who told them it was so? Now say otherwise?

How could Qanon have thrived had people like this old chick of an attorney had not claimed she had facts?
Qanon never claimed they had facts. They claimed the same as Oath keepers the same as Proud Boys- that Trump's team had undeniable proof, yet when they were taken to court, they stated the opposite. How is that ok?




Trump lawyer walks back previous election fraud claims

Trump's former lawyer (how many has he gone through?!) stated this in her defense:
No reasonable person would have believed her

Who is she talking about?

She was brought in by Rudy
Rudy was brought in by Donnie
and who voted for donnie?

How then could the no reasonable person(s) not be the donnie voters?

How can they be ok with her using that as a defense in court? If you who believed her---were reasonable- you in fact would have NOT believed her.
That was her defense, damn! meaning there would have been what reason to go to the stop the steal ralley which turned into graffitti, pissing in the hallways, defecating (shitting) in the Capital halls, damaging, looting, injuring and murdering...none of this would have happened - if they had used reasoning, wow...