Any Parler fans here?

I heard they were the anecdote to left wingism. When I heard of zuckerfuck, zuckerburg working with FBI wasn't sure if he was trying to do the right thing or trying to supress speech he didnt want- after all it is his shit, he aint got to accept all.


I understood both sides. But since millions turned to Parler- I wondered why the silence on these guys- only to learn right before the D-day aka Donald's Day aka Jan 6th.


The Wall Street Journal detailed how Parler made more than 50 referrals to the FBI ahead of the violent siege.


One user wrote: "To confirm, you are calling for an investigation into big tech collusion while you are colluding with the FBI against your platform members?"

Another user wrote: "This is NOT an example of a free speech platform. Parler is a fraud."


Question- when is free speech not free speech?

If someone posts your address on lets say Muhfreedom.abc & told users to go by and douse your house with buckets of camel snot. And someone told the cops- next day they got 4 guys front page with 18 bucket loads...plot stopped.
would you be angry at muhfreedom.abc for preventing it?

Serious would you?

WTF was Parler supposed to do? If they got folks planning out in the open- what they were going to do Jan 6th naming their organizations. at what point do you as the owner of a social platform either intervene or close their account out...knowing if you do-- the following will occur:


"I guess when a company says they are a free speech platform I would not expect them to turn folks over to the corrupt FBI," one person commented.

Another wrote:
"How is this supposed to make us want to stay on Parler when you violated people's right to free speech?"

A third Parler user said: "So you are saying you ratted on a bunch of us."


Can we conclude these members were not BLM? I mean why would Parler protect leftists free speech? Especially if the speech involved premeditated actions.


I can't say Parler is a fake platform. I can't or won't say they denied free speech.

think I can say they denied individuals the right to congregate on their site planning acts that they assumed was meant to cause damage in any nature- be it dousing someone's home with toilet paper or ruining the State Capital.