Canelo v Saunders - May 8th Unification fight

[smashup]

According to Saunders Dad, Hearns being a cunt during this build up.
Making it virtually impossible for UK fans to get tickets, no UK judges involved and has told team Saunders themselves to pay for 50% of the team to fly over so.
He's also apparently been overheard saying "If Saunders wins this he's gonna fuck everything up for us"

Basically doing everything he can to give his cash cow Canelo every possible advantage.

Saunders dad has no reason at all to lie about any of this and just wants his son to get given a fair go of winning.

[TIC]

According to Saunders Dad, Hearns being a cunt during this build up.
Making it virtually impossible for UK fans to get tickets, no UK judges involved and has told team Saunders themselves to pay for 50% of the team to fly over so.
He's also apparently been overheard saying "If Saunders wins this he's gonna fuck everything up for us"

Basically doing everything he can to give his cash cow Canelo every possible advantage.

Saunders dad has no reason at all to lie about any of this and just wants his son to get given a fair go of winning.

no one forced him to sign to contract. billy joe is cashing out. canelo ices him

[TitoFan]

[Primo Carnera]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

[TitoFan]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

We all know about A side and B side. But those negotiations are supposed to happen before the contract is signed.

Saunders says "I want a British judge" and Canelo says "No dice... they'll all be Mexican"... Saunders can walk. No contract... no fight.

Ginger's the A side... everyone knows that.

Once the contract is signed, if it mentioned a British judge... it's still a contract. Otherwise why even bother with contracts?

A side means you have the upper hand in the negotiations. Not that you can wipe your ass with a signed contract after the fight preparations are underway.

Having said that... Ginger lives under his own rules... blessed by the WBC (we all know by now what that stands for) and all the powers-that-be in boxing.

[Primo Carnera]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

We all know about A side and B side. But those negotiations are supposed to happen before the contract is signed.

Saunders says "I want a British judge" and Canelo says "No dice... they'll all be Mexican"... Saunders can walk. No contract... no fight.

Ginger's the A side... everyone knows that.

Once the contract is signed, if it mentioned a British judge... it's still a contract. Otherwise why even bother with contracts?

A side means you have the upper hand in the negotiations. Not that you can wipe your ass with a signed contract after the fight preparations are underway.

Having said that... Ginger lives under his own rules... blessed by the WBC (we all know by now what that stands for) and all the powers-that-be in boxing.

So are you saying it was stipulated in the contract that there would be a British Judge? Because I heard that the contract stated that there would be 3 “neutral” judges?

[erics44]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

I dislike the imaginary card, those who brandish it should be booked or sent off depending on the colour of their imaginary card

diving though goes a lot deeper for me, rolling around on the floor maybe should be punished but going down seems like a necessary evil

[Primo Carnera]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

I dislike the imaginary card, those who brandish it should be booked or sent off depending on the colour of their imaginary card

diving though goes a lot deeper for me, rolling around on the floor maybe should be punished but going down seems like a necessary evil

I’ve got A couple of issues with your post and I’ll try to address them one by one.
Apologies in advance for going off topic.
1. The imaginary card is to highlight an issue and seek justice. Billy Jo whingeing about stuff is to highlight an issue and seek justice. What’s the difference.
2. Diving is a “necessary evil” are you saying with or without contact? Are you saying CHEATING is “a necessary evil.”

[erics44]

I’m not sure when people are going to actual realise this is true, but whether we like it or not, there is an A side and a B side, and the A side gets to call the shots. FACT!
Wlad , Floyd, now Canelo.
You might think it’s wrong, you might think it’s unfair, but it is what it is.
Saunders has got 2 choices, like it or fucking lump it.
And as for all the people saying “all he can do is moan about it to highlight it”, they’re the very same people that criticise Divers and people waving imaginary cards in football. Tell me, what’s the difference?

I dislike the imaginary card, those who brandish it should be booked or sent off depending on the colour of their imaginary card

diving though goes a lot deeper for me, rolling around on the floor maybe should be punished but going down seems like a necessary evil

I’ve got A couple of issues with your post and I’ll try to address them one by one.
Apologies in advance for going off topic.
1. The imaginary card is to highlight an issue and seek justice. Billy Jo whingeing about stuff is to highlight an issue and seek justice. What’s the difference.
2. Diving is a “necessary evil” are you saying with or without contact? Are you saying CHEATING is “a necessary evil.”

like I say, diving goes deeper than a simple answer

and no, 99 times out of 100 diving without contact isnt acceptable but im not sure all diving (or going down easy) is unacceptable, i think winning games by kicking people is more unacceptable

and i see your point about the imaginary card but i dont think that there is any honesty when people are branding it and i think its more about gaining an advantage

and i dont think its the same as BJS complaining about the judges, if england played spain in the world cup final - in Spain with a Spanish ref and linesman and Southgate complained then thats more like what BJS is doing

branding the card is more like BJS complaining about holding or hitting behind the head or something, asking for a point off