Thanks: 114
Likes: 403
Dislikes: 12
Array
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cyber...b05af50dc1a226
"Judge Slaps Down Election Recount Firm Hired By Arizona GOP Senate"
This is a couple of days old, so who's to say what's happening now in the Arizona Circus. It's heartening to know there are some sane people watching over the asylum. On the other hand, who's to know what damage may have already been done, what with bozos running around with black ink pens and cloaked in secrecy.
So let's recap. These "Stop the Steal" morons would demand that this recount be done:
- In secret
- With ZERO oversight
- With black ink pens in hand
Sounds fair to me.
Personally, I think the Supreme Court should step in and put an end to this wasteful nonsense.
Array
Array
Fox News’ Chris Wallace pressed Senator Bill Cassidy on whether the Trump administration’s tax cuts have done more to help the wealthy than anyone else.
Wallace brought up Tax Policy Center data showing the average first year tax cut was just $60 for a household making less than $25,000, while households making $3.4 million saw average cuts of $193,000. On top of this, Wallace added, the data suggests that these tax cuts will add $1.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.
“Senator, of the 2 million tax filers in Louisiana, only 14,000 of them were paying more, filing gross income of more than $500,000,” Wallace said. “What’s wrong with raising the top tax rate to where it was during the Bush 43 and Obama administrations in order to help the working and middle-class?”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-wa...e-paying-more/
It turns out that Biden is going for a top rate increase from 37% to a gigantic 39.6% on people earning over $452 000. So in the example above of somebody earning half a million they'd be paying an extra two point six percent on their earnings above 452, or around sixty dollars a week extra tax on their ten thousand dollar a week income. I don't think this is asking too much, do you?
Worth remembering in the fifties and sixties, back when America was great, the top rate of tax was 91%. Unemployment was three percent and economic growth was double that of the supply side era. These things are not coincidental. And the Rockerfellers and the Gettys still managed to scrape a living.
Array
Some more random stuff:
Ted Cruz:
https://twitter.com/bendreyfuss/stat...71511845314562
Voting stuff:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/01/u...lwatchers.html
https://twitter.com/AriBerman/status...21067391225858
https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/st...20339952111622
https://twitter.com/JanNWolfe/status...30751552897031
One for Spicoli:
https://twitter.com/stuartpstevens/s...07640356741123
Array
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/el...-20201223.html
Voter fraud update.
Array
Arizona latest. It's getting even weirder:
https://twitter.com/nickmartin/statu...15489691164673
Random stuff:
https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/1390036676391673863
https://twitter.com/dmataconis/statu...87566204686337
https://twitter.com/JonathanSelbin/s...19177910231046
https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/st...18815669178369
https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1387173526029832193
Array
Liz Cheney. Bigger free swinging Freedom balls and truths spoken than 99 percent of the remaining orange nosed arse tickling imposters currently pretending to be conservative Republicans. Credit where credit is due.
Array
It's like the scene at the end of Raging Bull where fat De Niro is doing bad jokes in the nightclub.
Conventional wisdom says he's finished and won't run again because it's hard to knock off an incumbent and the economy should be doing well so he'll lose again. None of that will bother him. He just loves to be the centre of attention, loves the rallies more than anything and knows he can walk the nomination. Even if he does lose he can say it was stolen again. I just can't see him watching somebody else run for prez if he's fit and well enough to do it himself.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks