I’ve said this on another thread, but I just don’t see it.

I do get the point that he actually moved up in weight and all that, but (to me anyway) he is like a Buddy McGirt or a Winky Wright type - really good, tough, solid technician but doesn’t do anything spectacular in there or risk going balls out anytime.

I was never a Mayweather fan really, but I could see that he was an exceptional talent in there. I don’t see that with Crawford.

Admittedly, he has never really been troubled so he must be fucking good ….. but an ATG? Better than Mayweather? I get the feeling that I must be missing something as everyone else thinks differently?