the scam is over. what's next?

[Beanz]

The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.

TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.

show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg

You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.

It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.

If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.

seven times larry the sperg you have no scientific method to show that your hypothesis that convid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. you only hold a belief you spastic

The scientific method is exactly how and why we all know that Covid is real. Your idea that you conducting a one off experiment would be a way of you knowing something is delusional nonsense. All it would do is support your assumptions and bias. You would have to trust all the manufacturers of the equipment and previously agreed scientific methods and conditions to do so. All these were arrived at by consensus, which because you are unable to think critically, is something you think is an indication of an international conspiracy.

It is not my hypothesis, it is one proposed and tested by thousands of competing experts in independent labs around the world. Their consensus is arrived at by meticulous competitive peer review of each other's work.

We have all conducted numerous home experiments with lateral flow tests in order to be able to go about our lives and not be crippled by fear or the fairy tale beliefs that have obviously crippled you mentally and emotionally for nearly two years now.

We know, we truly know whilst you only believe.

[TIC]

The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.

TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.

show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg

You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.

It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.

If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.

seven times larry the sperg you have no scientific method to show that your hypothesis that convid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. you only hold a belief you spastic

The scientific method is exactly how and why we all know that Covid is real. Your idea that you conducting a one off experiment would be a way of you knowing something is delusional nonsense. All it would do is support your assumptions and bias. You would have to trust all the manufacturers of the equipment and previously agreed scientific methods and conditions to do so. All these were arrived at by consensus, which because you are unable to think critically, is something you think is an indication of an international conspiracy.

It is not my hypothesis, it is one proposed and tested by thousands of competing experts in independent labs around the world. Their consensus is arrived at by meticulous competitive peer review of each other's work.

We have all conducted numerous home experiments with lateral flow tests in order to be able to go about our lives and not be crippled by fear or the fairy tale beliefs that have obviously crippled you mentally and emotionally for nearly two years now.

We know, we truly know whilst you only believe.

you don't know shit. you only believe what you have been told & you are too retarded to understand the difference. i never said anything about a one of experiment. i am asking for the scientific method you used to verify your belief to be true. consensus is not you proving the claim is true & is another fallacy. if you know something that would mean you have proved it to be true & i can also verify it. you believe, you only believe spergy larry.

[X]

I don’t really want to get embroiled in this argument (love fest), but don’t forget I did a scientific experiment that showed I could isolate the virus, and then I could catch it through the air and off a surface

Sadly, the tramp I was keeping in the garage to prove some further medical breakthroughs didn’t quite make it. I think he died sometime on Friday night as I was trying to slim him down a bit to properly pass through my sieve to make absolutely sure there were no contaminants etc.

Its a shame as I wasted some of my cats food on him, but there is another one on a local park bench that I have my eye on for next time. Rest assured I will keep you informed. I’m looking to capture him like Buffalo Bill did, with some sort of van and a plaster cast and a ruse with a sofa.

[TitoFan]

It's no use.

She doesn't believe COVID exists either.

[TIC]

It's no use.

She doesn't believe COVID exists either.

it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief

[TitoFan]

It's no use.

She doesn't believe COVID exists either.

it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief

I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.

[TIC]

It's no use.

She doesn't believe COVID exists either.

it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief

I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.

like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true