So who's the male tennis GOAT?

[TitoFan]

Too bad Novak had to miss the Australian... but now I'm rooting for him to catch and pass Rafa.

Sorry. I don't want a clay court specialist to be considered the male tennis GOAT.

Had Novak been allowed to play, he arguably would've been the one to pick up his 21st.

I was always a HUGE Fed fan. But he lost too many head-to-head against the other two and doesn't deserve to be in the GOAT conversations, TBH.

Including a heartbreaker to Nadal at Wimbledon... FEDERER'S "TURF"!!

[Mark TKO]

Roger was past his prime when the other two hit theirs and the standard of these 3 has been that high that makes all the difference.

We are talking fractions here. How lucky we've been to witness this era. Can't see it happening again.

[TitoFan]

Roger was past his prime when the other two hit theirs and the standard of these 3 has been that high that makes all the difference.

We are talking fractions here. How lucky we've been to witness this era. Can't see it happening again.

I think there was a bit of an overlap. It's not like Roger was an old man when he lost to Nadal. He'd be the first to say he blew some golden opportunities. By now, yeah... he's over the hill.

But yes... we're lucky indeed. We may well end up with the Big Three on top of the GOAT heap for quite some time.

But we're compelled to put them in order... and I for one will never think of Rafa as the GOAT.

[Mark TKO]

Yes his clay record is that amazing it skews his overall slam record compared to the other two - but even without the French his record is still fucking brilliant!

His head to head record with Roger also skewed by his clay dominance. Is clay slower? I can't remember what the actual difference is and what makes it so perfect for nadals style.

Over the years we've seen many who struggled on grass and clay etc.

Hope Roger gets to play Wimbledon one last time for a Farewell.

Never actually checked how many slam finals they've each lost. I shall do that later when I'm working.

[Master]

Clay is slower, requires more power and endurance. Perfect for Nadal.

[Mark TKO]

cheers - I'd since read up. Longer rallies and endurance. Surprises me at the French how still there's very few breaks of serve yet within 2 or 3 strokes of the rally starting you'd think it wouldn't matter.

Am I alone in being a big fan of the tennis played at Wimbledon from mid 80s when it was BOOM, BOOM and move in for the volley. I'm certain in one final in the Sampras era (might have been against Rafter the Shafter) the longest rally was about 4 strokes.

Australian open was played on grass till 1987, never knew that

US Open was played on grass till 74, then clay for 3 years till hard court came in

[Mark TKO]

Also I bet Nadal was well chuffed he only had to play an extra 3 hours 57 minutes in the mens final than Ashleigh Barty in the ladies final to get the same pay cheque.


Equal rights indeed

[Master]

I was a Borg fan and did not like the young gun McEnroe.

Remember Becker as a 17 year old win Wimbledon - Loved Gabriel Sabatini but that is a separate subject.

Wanted Ivan Lendl to win Wimbeldon and he failed every year but won French most of the time.

Never wanted Tim Henman to win Wimbeldon and loved it when Goran Ivanisevic won it.

Then Sampras took over.