larry the sperg wants to keep it civil when it suits him. you treat larry how you feel he should be treated & i'll treat him how i feel he should be treated. you were the one wanting to continue the covid dialogue i this thread. i said i was wanting to focus on what might be next. you wanted to continue. no one needs to prove their belief. just admit it is only a belief or prove it is real. you can forget onuses & burdens. i will continue to hold those making claims to their responsibility. everyone is free to believe what they want. if they want to claim that belief is real it needs to be proven. i've never said the world revolves around me. just asked people to prove their claims are real. sound fair?stop playing the victim you spastic. you started with the insults & now have to live with it. there is no argument on my side. i am asking you to prove your belief. all you have done is use logical fallacies because you can't prove your belief is true. you are trying to control how i post because you can't handle the heat that you started. that is censoring. there is an ignore button there for a reason. use it or harder up retardThere is nothing nasty in anything I have said to you. I have kept it perfectly civil and not resorted to the childish spiteful personal ad hominem stuff you have stooped to in the absence of any cogent argument.you deserve everything you get you nasty little sperg. they have allowed wishing people will die, admitted threats, giving medical advice & a whole lot more. the mods should be applauded for allowing free speech. you are the problem & here you are trying to cancel & censor someone. if you don't want to read it you can use ignore or scroll right on past. no one is forcing you to engage or to even be here. sadly for you like i said you are a sucker for punishment & crave the abuse & like the retard you are you continue to come back for more. so open up wide spastic & i'll talk to you soon sweetieIt is amazing that this kind of crap is allowed to roll here still.talking about consensus is nothing you have personally done. this discussion is between you & i. if you haven't verified the claims yourself then you only have faith that they are true. that is a belief you spastic. i never said anything about a one off experiment spergy larry. give me everything you have done to test the claim & prove it to be true. then i should be able to repeat everything you have done & prove it true as well. you have already admitted that you haven't done anything & only have faith & trust in others, that is why you keep using fallacies & talking about what others have done. see i believe i could beat your wife in a hundred metre sprint with me on my knees but until i did so it is only a belief. once i did we would know that i was able to. watching you sperg gives me great pleasure & i love that you are a sucker for punishment cause you will be treated this way every time i reply to you. talk soon retardyou have been proven a liar over & over spergy larry. you haven't provided any evidence of the scientific method you used to prove your belief. all i want is for you to prove your belief. & we both know you can't or you would have done so already. the problem is you can't admit you only hold a belief & faith in authority. scientific consensus is another fallacy. i am asking you to prove your beliefLet's be clear here. TIC is a liar.
He claims to only be interested in what you can prove to be true but then refuses to consider any kind of evidence.
What he really wants, is to have his bias and his childish beliefs in conspiracy theories, that make him think he is better than everyone here, confirmed.
Calling a virus that has affected everyone here 'convid' and then claiming 'the scam is over' is not a neutral position that respects anyone's acquired knowledge. It is an arrogant demand to be treated differently and to give presidency to beliefs over knowledge.
His insistence that scientific consensus is not evidence, is not so different to claims made by flat earthers or religious crackpots.
Ask away numbnuts for all the good it will do you. Scientific concensus is not a fallacy, far from it. It is the wheel that progress was built upon. It has given you and everyone else the kind of security and unimaginable diverse range of experiences and benefits that generations before us could not even dream about. You are and always have been the one who the onus falls to prove your pseudo scientific psychobabble.
You are not able to understand the rules of engagement and so have no right to anything. You don't even understand what a logical fallacy is.
The Scientific method is not a set of rules you can follow to carry out a one off experiment, it is the method by which knowledge is gathered by questioning, experimenting and proving again and again, something you as a clueless twat waffle are still struggling to comprehend. The argument was won months ago and all you have is your belief and repeated lies.
You say you want people to prove their belief when you will not accept any kind of evidence whatsoever. Anyone can make vague, unobservable claims that are unfalsifiable but we all have rock solid verifiable knowledge to explain what you are too dense to absorb.
There are no plausible mechanisms that allow for your extraordinairy exaggerated claims to be explained using existing knowledge and so they can be ignored by anyone with even just a little common sense.
Nobody is trying to cancel or censor you but there is no excuse for mentioning people's names, families, and using terms like spastic, retard and sperg as though disabilities are something to laugh about.
All he's asking is for you to keep it civil. Surely not too much to ask. Who cares who "started it"? That's a childish argument for wanting to keep up hostilities in an argument.
That was point # 1.
Point # 2 is that it's been "beaten into the ground" that no one here is trying to convince you of anything.
I honestly don't think anyone here really gives a shit what you believe.
So your insistence that anyone has to (cough) "prove" anything to you is puzzling. Obviously ignored... but puzzling.
Why can't you just leave it as is?
You think one way... the rest of civilization thinks another.
Forget onuses or burdens or any such crap.
Everyone is free to think what they want, and you've obviously made your decision a long time ago.
Luckily, the world doesn't revolve around what you think.
Sound fair to you?
Bookmarks