Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
It’s ok saying “after re-watching , it was a close fight.” And Froch made a decent point about the challenger getting negative in the last 4 rounds not being a good look to the judges.
But I still haven’t heard anybody saying Taylor won. So 100% of people gave it to Catterall and it’s not a robbery ?
You shouldn’t have to win every round and knock the champion down 6 times to take his title.
You just have to win the fight. It is a sport ffs and should be fair and competitive. It’s not a handicap horse race.
Just happened to see it the same each time. Froch may be onto something too. Catterall again, the cleaner guy doing more of what he wanted to do. But it was just a fractured type fight. Style wise and again the spastic officiating. Jack won it but when I think robbery it's a negative widish wash on the cards. Just one man's opinion and I cannot speak to the consensus of the internet . Totally agree you don't have to batter a guy pillar to post to 'take' a belt. Outdated cliche with too much emphasis on dime a dozen trinkets rather than the talent that turns boxing on its head.