Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  19
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,918
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Take all that on board, but 2 similar but slightly different questions.
    1. Who wins at LHW ? Michael Spinks or RJJ ?
    2. Prime v prime , Michael Spinks or RJJ ?
    Good questions, make you think hard, as it is an interesting matchup which has so many dynamics and factors at play.

    1. Michael Spinks wins at light heavyweight as he was a ATG at the weight and would do whatever it takes to get the win. He would adapt and adjust to whatever Roy Jones brings and be better.

    2. Prime v prime and pound for pound Roy Jones was a god of boxing and he was the best I have ever seen. He was untouchable at middleweight and supermiddleweight against quality boxers. At light heavyweight it was just his resting ground where he was content to pick up the titles after playing some basketball.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    800
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    1. Head to head would be an interesting fight. Spinks is the naturally larger man, and he was awkward. Roy was equally awkward but in a more aesthetically pleasing and athletic way. Spinks beat better competition at 175, but Roy toyed with those he faced, meaning he had plenty that he never had to show (until the rematch with Montell and first Tarver fight). Head to head I will lean slightly to Roy- he didn’t hit as hard here (outside of Hill’s ribs and the Montell rematch) but he could still crack and his speed was on another level. I don’t see Spinks bullying him like he would haVe to do to win.

    2. Historically it is easier (in my mind) to rank them. Spinks is higher at 175 due to cleaning out the division, and Roy is higher in a P4P sense for his 175 reign plus everything else he did outside of that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,873
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    I rate Michael Spinks highly. Obviously much higher than his flash-in-the-pan brother Leon.

    It's only that Michael had no business being at heavyweight... and had the misfortune of coming up to face one of the most feared heavyweights of all time, in Mike Tyson.

    What followed was a slaughter.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    11,895
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    488
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    michael is one of the best light heavyweights of all time & he challenged himself at heavyweight
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,098
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    850
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    Spinks was a great boxer, but Tyson was an animal. Spinks may have won against Evander or Lewis, because styles makes fights. But guys like Tyson and Bowe would have killed him...
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,297
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5152
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    It's a shame really that the Tyson annihilation is the forever cloud over Spinks successful run to heavyweight and sort of eclipses what he had accomplished prior. You get the feeling he didn't want to be there at all and had already reached his ceiling physically and mentally. Even though the Holmes W's deserve huge asterisks they ran it back in what ? six months and Spinks competed and notched rounds at the highest level. I'd place Spinks hvy title as and more meaningful than Toney-Jones title wins but Toney technically screwed himself out of actually claiming one. And lineal meant something then, now we just count trinkets like a squirrel hoards nuts. On Holyfield I don't see Spinks beating him at cruiser or heavy though cruiser would have been massive. But the physicality inside and speed was more than matched by Holyfield who packed more pop on the combos and would prove to walk through some of the biggest punchers we've known when he was in top form.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,066
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2288
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Michael Spinks? 31-1 with 21 KOs

    Spinks was a superb fighter, whose legacy will forever be tainted by the single loss on his register.

    Always fit, always ready, he had an excellent amateur career and was completely dominant at the weight (when there was quite a bit of talent staying at light-heavy in those days)

    Hugely awkward, with a unique herky-jerky style that was such a conundrum for opponents to try and figure out. He topped that off with a thudding and accurate right hand that contained enough power to knock out gigantic heavyweights.

    Spinks created genuine history by being the first LHW to conquer the heavyweight division, after some seriously great fighters had failed. Homes was ageing, but still a very serious threat to anyone. It says how highly Spinks was regarded when he was widely seen as the only credible challenge to a peak young Tyson.

    He was blown away by Iron Mike, no question about it. I remember watching the fight ...... the first knockdown was Spinks thinking clearly under pressure and taking a knee to buy himself a bit of time. Very clever. The second was 'goodbye'.

    He retired after the Tyson fight and never came back. A great legacy, a shame that people only remember his last fight and not the Olympic Gold, wins over Qawi, Mustafa Muhammad, Davis and 10 successful title defences.

    Up there with Moore and Charles in the debate about the greatest ever LHW. Comparing him to Holyfield is slightly unfair because a) they are naturally of different sizes and b) Evan Field was juiced to his eyeballs.
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Michael Spinks Vs Michael Moorer at Light Heavyweight
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-26-2013, 08:26 PM
  2. Michael Spinks accomplishments
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-22-2009, 05:47 PM
  3. Michael Spinks
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-20-2008, 05:54 PM
  4. Michael Spinks vs Roy Jones
    By Mr140 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-10-2007, 11:42 PM
  5. Michael Spinks vs Roy jones jr.
    By Mr140 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-16-2007, 09:05 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing