Canelo Alvarez vs Gennady Golovkin III 17/9/22

[TitoFan]

You know... I feel kinda bad making you look like an ass.

So let's break this down.

Ok so I said, GGG has fought his entire career at middleweight... and you pointed out that once he fought at super middle because he fought at 163 pounds.

So to you, once 3 pounds over 160 in 43 career fights constitutes not having fought at middleweight his entire career.

Cool.

To me, it still does.

And I believe to most post-pubescent adults, they understand the same.

If you need to have the word "basically" added as a qualifier in order to understand... there's little I can do to help you there.




You do realize, right? that it is pretty much a child-like technique to latch onto an insignificant detail when you've got no argument.

Just wanted to point that out.



It's like... you just got slammed on the tennis court. But you're claiming some sort of victory because the guy who whipped your ass just tripped over the ball bucket on his way back to the locker room.

Maybe not the best analogy... but you get the point.

[TitoFan]

See it's like this....

If you've spent your whole life being an ass..... and one day you say or do something "non-asslike"..... and I say you've spent your whole life being an ass..... technically I'm not wrong.

Not sure if you followed me there.

I can go slower if you'd like.

[TIC]

See it's like this....

If you've spent your whole life being an ass..... and one day you say or do something "non-asslike"..... and I say you've spent your whole life being an ass..... technically I'm not wrong.

Not sure if you followed me there.

I can go slower if you'd like.

if you claim something is a fact & it is not you are wrong

[palmerq]

I'm going to go with Alvarez by ko well tko to be exact, I think the body punches will add up on Golovkin and it'll end around the tenth..I do think Golovkin is going to do quite a bit better than many expect especially Hearn and dazn, he could well have beaten Alvarez twice already so I think he has his number, I don't think Golovkin is finished either but he is 40 and the Murata performance was worrying at times so I think the heavy body shots will end him..I think it'd be a good win for Alvarez if he manages it, Golovkin is still one of the best out there, don't think it's an amazing win or anything like that, I think Alvarez's other wins at 168 rank higher than this potential win..

I think it's also going to make pretty good viewing, Golovkin is a top class Operator after all but I am expecting an Alvarez win. It'll be a bit like Joshua beating other Kazak born Klitschko, different stages of their careers of course( Joshua and Alvarez), but I think Wladimir would have beaten Joshua when wlad was younger but he wasn't and he lost and it was a good win for Joshua despite the other guy being over 40

[TitoFan]

I'm going to go with Alvarez by ko well tko to be exact, I think the body punches will add up on Golovkin and it'll end around the tenth..I do think Golovkin is going to do quite a bit better than many expect especially Hearn and dazn, he could well have beaten Alvarez twice already so I think he has his number, I don't think Golovkin is finished either but he is 40 and the Murata performance was worrying at times so I think the heavy body shots will end him..I think it'd be a good win for Alvarez if he manages it, Golovkin is still one of the best out there, don't think it's an amazing win or anything like that, I think Alvarez's other wins at 168 rank higher than this potential win..

I think it's also going to make pretty good viewing, Golovkin is a top class Operator after all but I am expecting an Alvarez win. It'll be a bit like Joshua beating other Kazak born Klitschko, different stages of their careers of course( Joshua and Alvarez), but I think Wladimir would have beaten Joshua when wlad was younger but he wasn't and he lost and it was a good win for Joshua despite the other guy being over 40

A little bit like Joshua, because of the age involved. But some might consider that to be Joshua's best win. At the time it "one-upped" Fury's maddeningly boring UD over Wlad. Still, no other factors other than age were at play. They were both bonafide heavyweights with no significant size advantage to either side. The fight was at Wembley Stadium, but it did end in a TKO, leaving the judges out of the equation. It was the one and only time they fought, so there was no questionable decision baggage to sift through.

I like Golovkin, and have always been a fan. But right now he's benefitting from slim pickings at 160, combined with the four alphabet orgs, of which at least one of them has relative riff-raff at the top contender list. As you said, the Murata fight was worrying at times. My way of saying it is that it showed GGG is pretty much past his prime. Golovkin is ripe for the picking, and is being handed on a silver platter to Canelo.

[TIC]

You know... I feel kinda bad making you look like an ass.

So let's break this down.

Ok so I said, GGG has fought his entire career at middleweight... and you pointed out that once he fought at super middle because he fought at 163 pounds.

So to you, once 3 pounds over 160 in 43 career fights constitutes not having fought at middleweight his entire career.

Cool.

To me, it still does.

And I believe to most post-pubescent adults, they understand the same.

If you need to have the word "basically" added as a qualifier in order to understand... there's little I can do to help you there.




You do realize, right? that it is pretty much a child-like technique to latch onto an insignificant detail when you've got no argument.

Just wanted to point that out.



It's like... you just got slammed on the tennis court. But you're claiming some sort of victory because the guy who whipped your ass just tripped over the ball bucket on his way back to the locker room.

Maybe not the best analogy... but you get the point.

you have made yourself look foolish. fighting once at super middleweight makes your claim, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. that claim is wrong. it is not a fact & it is the very reason you haven't answered what weight division would one sixty three within. because you know it is within the super middleweight division & because of that fact then your claim is wrong. adding the word basically is not the same is claiming something is a fact, most people understand this. my point about your false claim has nothing to do with you thinking ggg is over the hill & me disagreeing, two different things. you making a claim that was wrong is a different argument to the canelo v ggg match up