Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
You know... I feel kinda bad making you look like an ass.

So let's break this down.

Ok so I said, GGG has fought his entire career at middleweight... and you pointed out that once he fought at super middle because he fought at 163 pounds.

So to you, once 3 pounds over 160 in 43 career fights constitutes not having fought at middleweight his entire career.

Cool.

To me, it still does.

And I believe to most post-pubescent adults, they understand the same.

If you need to have the word "basically" added as a qualifier in order to understand... there's little I can do to help you there.




You do realize, right? that it is pretty much a child-like technique to latch onto an insignificant detail when you've got no argument.

Just wanted to point that out.



It's like... you just got slammed on the tennis court. But you're claiming some sort of victory because the guy who whipped your ass just tripped over the ball bucket on his way back to the locker room.

Maybe not the best analogy... but you get the point.
you have made yourself look foolish. fighting once at super middleweight makes your claim, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. that claim is wrong. it is not a fact & it is the very reason you haven't answered what weight division would one sixty three within. because you know it is within the super middleweight division & because of that fact then your claim is wrong. adding the word basically is not the same is claiming something is a fact, most people understand this. my point about your false claim has nothing to do with you thinking ggg is over the hill & me disagreeing, two different things. you making a claim that was wrong is a different argument to the canelo v ggg match up