Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  34
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who wins?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 89

Thread: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,070
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    A good few years back when GGG was at his brutal best, I was touting Eubank Jnr as the man to topple him. Bomb proof chin. Great engine and output. I genuinely thought he had the tools to get the job done. Fast forward to present day and he's no closer to fighting him than he was back then. He'll drop his name of course. But Eubank's career has been at a mediocre stand still for years and despite what he says, his actions scream I'm not interested in fighting the biggest and best. He's found his niche in life and beating up average or undersized men is it.

    He'll flog the legacy narrative of course. Family name and any other trite bullshit he can think of to roll this turd in glitter. It was a joke that he actively pursued the Brook fight, it's a joke that he's taking this fight.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,202
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1881
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    The closer this gets the more ridiculous this match up seems. Benn could suffer a serious crushing loss here he may never recover from.
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,506
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    A good few years back when GGG was at his brutal best, I was touting Eubank Jnr as the man to topple him. Bomb proof chin. Great engine and output. I genuinely thought he had the tools to get the job done. Fast forward to present day and he's no closer to fighting him than he was back then. He'll drop his name of course. But Eubank's career has been at a mediocre stand still for years and despite what he says, his actions scream I'm not interested in fighting the biggest and best. He's found his niche in life and beating up average or undersized men is it.

    He'll flog the legacy narrative of course. Family name and any other trite bullshit he can think of to roll this turd in glitter. It was a joke that he actively pursued the Brook fight, it's a joke that he's taking this fight.
    The irony is that Brook may face the winner. More rubbish after this novelty fight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,506
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    THIS FIGHT SHOULD BE CALLED OFF!!!!!!

    Conor Benn fails drugs test but will still fight Chris Eubank Jnr

    Conor Benn has failed a drugs test but intends to proceed with this Saturday’s fight with Chris Eubank Jnr.

    The 26-year-old has reportedly tested positive for Clomifene, a substance normally used to treat infertility in women, but which can have beneficial effects on levels of testosterone in men.

    Clomifene is prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), although it is understood that the failed test was carried out by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (Vada).

    Benn has not failed any tests carried out by the UK Anti-Doping Agency (Ukad), who are appointed by the British Board of Boxing Control to conduct all regulatory testing for the fight. As a result, Benn and Eubank have signalled their intention to go ahead with Saturday's contest, despite the former's B sample yet to be tested by Vada.

    A statement published by Benn’s promoters Eddie Hearn, Matchroom Boxing and Wasserman Boxing read: “We have been made aware that a random anti-doping test for Conor Benn conducted by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association returned an adverse analytical finding for trace amounts of a fertility drug. The B sample has yet to be tested, meaning that no rule violation has been confirmed. Indeed, Mr Benn has not been charged with any rule violation, he is not suspended, and remains free to fight.

    “Mr Benn has since passed a doping control test conducted by the UK Anti-Doping Agency, the anti-doping authority to which the British Board of Boxing Control has delegated its doping control testing for the bout, Mr Benn has passed all doping control tests conducted by Ukad.

    “Both fighters have taken medical and legal advice, are aware of all relevant information, and wish to proceed with the bout this Saturday.”

    Telegraph Sport has contacted the British Boxing Board of Control for comment.

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...a16ee10e9352a0
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,070
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    As if we don't get kicked in the nuts by boxing enough already.

    Complete and utter clusterfuck! Maybe Eddie being too busy to take Queensbury calls makes sense after all?

    The fight should be off, and Benn should be suspended pending the conclusion of the VADA testing process. Zero tolerance for failed drug tests. It has to be the only way.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,506
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    CHRIS EUBANK JR has claimed he did NOT receive a phone call from Conor Benn following his positive drugs test.

    The pair, whose fathers had two wars in the 1990s, are in danger of not fighting this Saturday after the British Boxing Board of Control called it off.

    The sold-out O2 and pay-per-view fight bout was dramatically thrown into doubt after it emerged that Benn, 25, had returned an adverse finding in his pre-fight drug test.

    But it was then confirmed that both fighters were happy for the fight to go ahead, with Benn claiming he had called Eubank Jr to talk things out.

    However, Eubank Jr has now denied a call ever took place.

    He told Matchroom Boxing: "There was no phone call. We haven't spoken since this was announced.

    "It's a shame. But my promoters, his promoters, the boxing board of control, they're going to sort it out.

    "I'm ready, I'm clean, I'm 60 per cent. I've been tested my entire career for the last 10 years. I've been tested more than I've ever been tested for a fight during this training camp.

    "I have an app on my phone where I have to designate where I'm going to be every single day and I've been on that app for my entire career and I will be on it for the rest of my career.

    "They can come and test me for blood and urine unannounced whenever they see fit and I've never failed a test. I've even been tested on holiday.

    "I don't condone failed tests."

    Eubank then went on to insist he remains focused on beating Benn this Saturday night, albeit with some reservations in the back of his head given the failed test.

    He continued: "I am staying out of the politics, I dont know whats going on, I have heard the news, all I can do is be a professional and be ready to fight, I am ready, and as news unfolds we will deal with it as it goes on.

    "I am prepared, I have done my job, it is now in hands of promoters, governing bodies to make this fight happen. All I can do is be ready.

    "Of course there are concerns, I can't really say too much. I am ready, I am a clean fighter, I have cut the weight, I am ready to go, I am in as much know as you guys are."

    Benn was told he had returned an adverse finding for the banned substance clomifene.

    The substance, which is usually used to treat infertility in women but can increase testosterone in men, is prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

    Benn responded to the findings by telling DAZN: "I've not committed any violations. I've not been suspended. So as far as I'm concerned the fight's still going ahead.

    "I've spoken to Chris [Eubank Jr] personally, and we both want the fight to go ahead.

    "We've both taken medical and legal advice, and as I said, we want the fight to happen for the fans.

    "I've signed up to every voluntary anti-doping testing there is under the sun.

    "Throughout my whole career I've been tested. All my UK tests have come back negative throughout my whole career, I've never had any issues before.

    "Even in the lead-up to this fight, my tests have come up negative, you know, so my team will find out as to why there's been an initial adverse finding in my test.

    "But as I said, as far as I'm concerned the fight is still going ahead, I'm a clean athlete and we'll get to the bottom of this.

    "I just want to thank everyone for their continued support and I'll see you on Saturday."

    Eubank Jr's promoter Kalle Sauerland confirmed the star was still happy to fight - with the boxer then sharing a statement from Matchroom alongside a facepalm emoji.

    Sauerland told TalkSPORT: “There has been a trace finding of a female fertility drug in a VADA test, which is seaware from the UKAD scheme.

    “At the end of August and the start of September, when this test was done and it was relayed to us when the result came back.

    “The board follows UKAD rules and the UKAD tests were negative. We took medical advice and although it is not a PED it can raise testosterone levels.

    “We discussed this with Chris and he was happy to continue and he spoke to Benn directly. They had a personal discussion and it's a personal matter for Benn.”

    Sauerland added: “I can confirm we and Chris want the bout to happen.

    “There was a trace finding, the key is the UKAD findings and medical advice. The medical advice is the be-all-and-end-all.

    “The instant reaction is FIGHT OFF but then you look into what it is.

    “You have to look at the scenario around it and the fact the other tests were not positive.”

    Matchroom promoter Hearn also released a statement confirming that the fight would still take place.

    He said: “We have been made aware that a random anti-doping test for Conor Benn conducted by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association returned an adverse analytical finding for trace amounts of a fertility drug.

    “The B sample has yet to be tested, meaning that no rule violation has been confirmed.

    “Indeed, Mr Benn has not been charged with any rule violation, he is not suspended, and he remains free to fight.

    “Mr Benn has since passed a doping control test conducted by the UK Anti-Doping Agency, the anti-doping authority to which the British Board of Boxing Control has delegated its doping control testing for the bout.

    “Mr Benn has passed all doping control tests conducted by UKAD.

    “Both fighters have taken medical and legal advice, are aware of all relevant information, and wish to proceed with the bout this Saturday.”

    However, the BBBoC stepped in and declared the scrap is prohibited under their sanctioning, despite BOTH fighters wanting to continue with the bout.

    A BBBoC statement read: "On the evening of 4th October 2022, the Board of the British Boxing Board of Control Limited resolved that the contest between Chris Eubank Jnr. and Conor Benn scheduled to take place on 8th October 2022 is prohibited as it is not in the interests of Boxing."

    Eubank Jr, 32, was preparing to fight at a career-lowest catchweight of 157lb, following stints at 160lb at middleweight and even 168lb.

    And anticipation was building on whether he would make the contracted limit, following posts dining out on fast food and puddings.

    Benn was also preparing to fight 10lb above any of his 21 prior wins in the ring.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/20013...st-phone-call/
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,506
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    Carl Frampton has made his position on what he thinks should happen to Conor Benn after his failed drugs test abundantly clear.

    This comes amid the news that Benn has tested positive for the banned substance clomifene from a VADA test (Voluntary Anti-Doping Association) ahead of his highly anticipated clash with Chris Eubank Jr on Saturday night.

    Clomifene is a substance banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency that is mainly used to treat infertility in women but it can also increase testosterone levels in men.

    As it stands both fighters and their promoters want the fight to still go ahead, as Benn has passed all tests carried out by UKAD (UK Anti-Doping).

    Eubank Jr’s promoter, Kalle Sauerland, even told talkSPORT that they had received medical advice telling them that clomifene is not a performance enhancing drug and should not give Benn any advantage.

    With that being said, the British Boxing Board of Control are trying to put a stop to the fight, as they released a statement saying that it was ‘prohibited’ and both teams had been informed.

    Former two-weight world champion, Carl Frampton, believes the fight should not only be cancelled but that any boxer who fails a drugs test should be banned from boxing for life.

    “Boxing does itself no favours,” Frampton posted on Twitter. “There should be no grey areas.

    “If you fail a test you’re banned and in my opinion you should be banned for life.

    “I’ve been super cautious from my amateur days of what I can and can’t take.

    “I wouldn’t take a multi vitamin unless VADA approved. I refused a topical psoriasis ointment as it had steroids in it.

    “Deterrents need to be stronger.”

    Speaking to talkSPORT, Frampton added:

    “Whether you’ve taken something accidentally or not you’ve still done something wrong.

    “It was drilled into me as an amateur about what I can and can’t take so you should just know better.

    “I had a bit of psoriasis on my skin before I fought in El Paso, it was a good bit, and I got a bit embarrassed about it but I was offered an ointment from a dermatologist but it contained steroids so I didn’t take it, I was afraid to take it.”

    As it stands the issue is being dealt with by lawyers, but Benn himself has come out saying that as far as he is concerned the fight is still going ahead and described himself as a ‘clean athlete.’

    https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/1...ris-eubank-jr/
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,070
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Conor Benn v Chris Eubank Jr

    Eddie is taking a right shoeing over this and rightly so. On cue Frank has come out and condemned everyone and everything. You watch him with a straight face announce Dubois V Browne next week. This game is fucking disgusting.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Conor Benn v Chris Algieri
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-15-2021, 08:42 PM
  2. Nigel Benn wants a 3rd fight With Chris Eubank
    By bzkfn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-28-2015, 04:33 PM
  3. did america really value Nigel Benn and Chris Eubank
    By HattonTheHammer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 08:40 AM
  4. Benn vs Barkley, Chris Eubank vs Nigel Benn video
    By The_One77 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 05:21 AM
  5. Nigel Benn V Chris Eubank 1990
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2006, 08:32 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing