
Originally Posted by
Master
I have thought about it and one of the main factors for p4p is based on how well you have done at other weights.
Manny is the better p4p fighter than Floyd. Hearns is better than Leonard.
Wlad dominated the division and had many defences which is why he was near the top.
Besides some of Canelo's best wins were at light middleweight.
Nah Mate, you are wriggling here big time, but I ain’t letting you off the hook. So many contradictions.
Can you be higher ranked p4p than your opponent, even if your opponent beat you ?
So , for example, most people rank Crawford higher than Spence p4p, but if Spence beat Crawford, would that still be the case?
Wlad dominated so he’s near the top. Guess what? Ward dominated……….. the only difference is WARD WAS NEVER BEATEN.
I totally see why you would rate Hearns highly, fuck me, I would . But Leonard not only beat him, but he also beat another guy that beat Hearns in Hagler.
So you can’t possibly put him above Leonard. It’s not like SRL didn’t do it at multiple weights.
Don’t get me wrong, I said the other week, if Hearns had beaten SRL and if he hadn’t thrown his game plan out the window against Hagler, we would’ve looked at his career very differently. He may have even been #1 on the all time list. But unfortunately those things never happened.
Trust me, nobody would’ve loved that scenario more than me. Hearns is one of my all time faves.
All of those things I’ve mentioned about SRL & Hearns, you could say the same about Floyd & Manny. But I’m not going to bother, because you clearly can’t be objective when it comes to Floyd.
Finally, you finished off your post trying to justify your view by saying some of Canelo’s best wins were at LMW.
So go on then, tell me which defences at LMW are good enough to elevate him above Ward?
Bookmarks