Master v TIC v Big J new lineage boxing prediction challenge

[Ron Swanson]

Exact round being worth a point brings a bit more luck than knowledge into it. Breaking it up into grouping rounds 1-6 “early”, 7-9”mid”, 10-12 “late” would play more towards understanding how a fight will play out, “predictive knowledge” than luck. Just a suggestion that would help determine who really understands these fights better

[TIC]

Exact round being worth a point brings a bit more luck than knowledge into it. Breaking it up into grouping rounds 1-6 “early”, 7-9”mid”, 10-12 “late” would play more towards understanding how a fight will play out, “predictive knowledge” than luck. Just a suggestion that would help determine who really understands these fights better

good suggestion, i was thinking something like a round either side of predicted round counts or gets a half point or something. i also think make your prediction after the weigh in is better than forty eight hours before the fight. my original challenge to primo carnera was spare of the moment, so the basic rules were just thrown together. primo carnera ducked my challenge by refusing to predict on a lineal/ ring belt fight, then a challenge was issued to myself, so the basic rules just followed on. unfortunately only two members showed interest to participate, so i doubt the contest will continue after june but i'll always be open to a challenge

[Master]

Exact round being worth a point brings a bit more luck than knowledge into it. Breaking it up into grouping rounds 1-6 “early”, 7-9”mid”, 10-12 “late” would play more towards understanding how a fight will play out, “predictive knowledge” than luck. Just a suggestion that would help determine who really understands these fights better

good suggestion, i was thinking something like a round either side of predicted round counts or gets a half point or something. i also think make your prediction after the weigh in is better than forty eight hours before the fight. my original challenge to primo carnera was spare of the moment, so the basic rules were just thrown together. primo carnera ducked my challenge by refusing to predict on a lineal/ ring belt fight, then a challenge was issued to myself, so the basic rules just followed on. unfortunately only two members showed interest to participate, so i doubt the contest will continue after june but i'll always be open to a challenge

I prefer closest round either side as it covers Ron's point about breaking the rounds into groups anyway.

[TIC]

round three

terence crawford v david avanesyan. result: terence crawford wko6
teofimo lopez v sandor martin. result: teofimo lopez wsd10
josh warrington v luis alberto lopez. result: luis alberto lopez wmd12
naoya inoue v paul butler. result: naoya inoue wko11

master
Terence Crawford UD David Avanesyan. correct winner +1, incorrect method +0 = 1
Teofimo Lopez UD Sandor Martin. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact decision type +0 = 2
Josh Warrington SD Luis Alberto Lopez. incorrect winner -1 = -1
Naoya Inoue KO3 Paul Butler. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact round +0 = 2

total: 4+4 = 8

tic
terence crawford knockout round ten. correct winner+1. correct method +1, incorrect exact round +0 = 2
teofimo lopez unanimous decision. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact decision type +0 = 2
luis alberto lopez split decision. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact decision type +0 = 2
naoya inoue knockout round two. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact round +0 = 2

total: 8+8 = 16

[Master]

Terence Crawford UD David Avanesyan
Teofimo Lopez UD Sandor Martin
Josh Warrington SD Luis Alberto Lopez
Naoya Inoue KO3 Paul Butler

[TIC]

terence crawford knockout round ten
teofimo lopez unanimous decision
luis alberto lopez split decision
naoya inoue knockout round two

[Master]

The person who predicts first should have the privilege of the opponent not to be able to copy the exact prediction as it is a disadvantage to go first from now on.