Master v TIC v Big J new lineage boxing prediction challenge

[TIC]

It is not an excuse just a suggestion. I am not accusing you of copying or playing it strategically.

I am just saying the first person that predicts a specific fight like UD then the other person can not do the exact same prediction they can go SD or MD.

Keep going, this is enjoyable and very simple. No need to void this week.

i was only kidding about the excuses. i think taking away a players ability to make a certain prediction limits the contest, sometimes we might make the same prediction. i would suggest from the next round that whoever is in the lead must post their predictions first, so whoever posts fights for the week just has to confirm if the other player doesn't want anything added, then the player in the lead must post their predictions first

[Master]

It is not an excuse just a suggestion. I am not accusing you of copying or playing it strategically.

I am just saying the first person that predicts a specific fight like UD then the other person can not do the exact same prediction they can go SD or MD.

Keep going, this is enjoyable and very simple. No need to void this week.

i was only kidding about the excuses. i think taking away a players ability to make a certain prediction limits the contest, sometimes we might make the same prediction. i would suggest from the next round that whoever is in the lead must post their predictions first, so whoever posts fights for the week just has to confirm if the other player doesn't want anything added, then the player in the lead must post their predictions first

OK but still think it is not too much trouble to not have the same exact prediction as there is only 2 of us.

[TIC]

It is not an excuse just a suggestion. I am not accusing you of copying or playing it strategically.

I am just saying the first person that predicts a specific fight like UD then the other person can not do the exact same prediction they can go SD or MD.

Keep going, this is enjoyable and very simple. No need to void this week.

i was only kidding about the excuses. i think taking away a players ability to make a certain prediction limits the contest, sometimes we might make the same prediction. i would suggest from the next round that whoever is in the lead must post their predictions first, so whoever posts fights for the week just has to confirm if the other player doesn't want anything added, then the player in the lead must post their predictions first

OK but still think it is not too much trouble to not have the same exact prediction as there is only 2 of us.

it's a prediction contest, you should be able to make any kind of prediction on the outcome

[Master]

When there only 2 of us then my suggestion is first predictor gets first dibs. It is not that controversial if I predict KO 7 you can pick KO6 or 8 Instead.

[TIC]

When there only 2 of us then my suggestion is first predictor gets first dibs. It is not that controversial if I predict KO 7 you can pick KO6 or 8 Instead.

it's a contest to test our prediction abilities, restricting a player from making a prediction type won't be an accurate reflection of the players predictions

[Master]

When there only 2 of us then my suggestion is first predictor gets first dibs. It is not that controversial if I predict KO 7 you can pick KO6 or 8 Instead.

it's a contest to test our prediction abilities, restricting a player from making a prediction type won't be an accurate reflection of the players predictions

I disagree and it was only a suggestion. So fine with carrying on.

[TIC]

round four

nikolai potapov v vincent astrolabio. result: vincent astrolabio wko6
jose uzcategui v vladimir shishkin. result: vladimir shishkin wud12
michel rivera v frank martin. result: frank martin wud12
mahmoud charr v lucas browne. cancelled
chris billam-smith v armend xhoxhaj. result: chris billam-smith wko5

tic
vincent astrolabio split decision. correct winner +1, incorrect method +0, incorrect exact decision type +0 = 1
vladimir shishkin unanimous decision. correct winner +1, correct method +1, correct exact decision type + 1 = 3
frank martin unanimous decision. correct winner +1, correct method +1, correct exact decision type +1 = 3
lucas browne knockout round five. cancelled
chris billam-smith knockout round eight. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact round +0 = 2

total: 16+9 = 25

master
Nicolai Potapov UD Vincent Astrolabio. incorrect winner -1 = -1
Vladimir Shishkin MD Jose Uzcategui. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact decision type +0 = 2
Michel Rivera KO8 Frank Martin. incorrect winner -1 = -1
Mahmoud Charr KO 6 Lucas Browne. cancelled
Chris Billam-Smith KO 10. correct winner +1, correct method +1, incorrect exact round +0 = 2

total: 8+2 = 10