WTF is stopping Canelo from fighting Benavidez?

[TIC]

This is no different to GGG v Brook. Yes we gave props to Brook for his balls, same as we probably will for Charlo. But it doesn’t make it right. I don’t know loads about Charlo, but I hope he fucking wins!
And like I keep saying , it’s down to
1. the governing bodies allowing it to happen and
2. The public for accepting it. Note I didn’t say fans, because fans are so fucking irrelevant.
“Undisputed v Undisputed “ ! Lame as fuck.
What next ? Fury v Inoue - “Undefeated v Undefeated!”

this fight is very different from ggg v kell. had ggg ever fought at welter? was kell undisputed at welter? errol brought mikey up. antiono brought bernard up. this is nothing new. the networks & promoters also have a hand in these fights. the public is not forced to watch or buy it, although i do think this fight will do well. this fight is undisputed v undisputed. you might think it's lame, doesn't make it not undisputed v undisputed though. tyson v naoya undefeated v undefeated is a false equivalence. like titofan likes to say. apples & oranges

[TIC]

[Primo Carnera]

This is no different to GGG v Brook. Yes we gave props to Brook for his balls, same as we probably will for Charlo. But it doesn’t make it right. I don’t know loads about Charlo, but I hope he fucking wins!
And like I keep saying , it’s down to
1. the governing bodies allowing it to happen and
2. The public for accepting it. Note I didn’t say fans, because fans are so fucking irrelevant.
“Undisputed v Undisputed “ ! Lame as fuck.
What next ? Fury v Inoue - “Undefeated v Undefeated!”

this fight is very different from ggg v kell. had ggg ever fought at welter? was kell undisputed at welter? errol brought mikey up. antiono brought bernard up. this is nothing new. the networks & promoters also have a hand in these fights. the public is not forced to watch or buy it, although i do think this fight will do well. this fight is undisputed v undisputed. you might think it's lame, doesn't make it not undisputed v undisputed though. tyson v naoya undefeated v undefeated is a false equivalence. like titofan likes to say. apples & oranges

this fight is very different from ggg v kell. had ggg ever fought at welter? was kell undisputed at welter?
The fact that Canelo fought at LMW a gazillion years ago is completely irrelevant and it is laughable that you are trying to make it relevant. If it means anything , then let’s have the fight at LMW! Or maybe a “Catchweight at MW.
brought mikey up. antiono brought bernard up. this is nothing new.it doesn’t make it right.
the networks & promoters also have a hand in these fights. the public is not forced to watch or buy it, although i do think this fight will do well. The fight probably “will do well,” because punters are basically mugs. Doesn’t mean it’s the fight that should be happening. You can come back with “Boxing is a business”, but first and foremost, Boxing is a Sport.
this fight is undisputed v undisputed. you might think it's lame, doesn't make it not undisputed v undisputed though. tyson v naoya undefeated v undefeated is a false equivalence. no it isn’t . It’s putting out a USP Marketing Slogan to sell a fight that shouldn’t be happening. Why are there weight divisions in Boxing? like titofan likes to say. apples & oranges.