It is not that I do not think Iran should not have won a title. But a 3 title winner is ridiculous for a guy as limited as Iran. Fact is that he had a style which worked against Hearns, yet Hearns was so much better. Hearns beat most guys he fought, and then Iran comes up and he is not any better than most of the guys Hearns had fought at the time, and he beats him and then beats him again later right after Hearns beats Virgil Hill. Just tells me that the style somehow works against Hearns. Iran's key fits Hearns lock. Yes I know that Iran had good fights with 2 legends Hearns and Duran, but still I think 3 titles for him is too many. Hearns and Duran deserve those titles but Iran?