Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  39
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Spence activates rematch clause.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,153
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2011
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Spence activates rematch clause.

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Would definitely say Spence should take a get back fight at 154 and give himself every shot of salvaging and steadying remainder of career. Saw talk that he may very well replace Derrick James too.
    calvin ford & roy jones jr are rumoured to be in the running as replacement options
    Never been big on Roy as full time trainer. Partly as he’s still determined to fight himself but Roy is going to Roy and always be a focus. He and Spence come off as polar opposites in personality and style. Either way, new trainer screams “tune up needed” before a Bud rematch with them.
    I don't think that Spence has a tune up in him, and I am pretty sure that Errol doesn't think that he has one in him, either. To me, it looks like a cash out move, because his option, moneywise, is Crawford and a tune up fight would put that at risk.
    The trainer change...I remember when Derrick was getting a ton of credit for teaching Spence to fight like a pro. In my opinion- and a this is based on a detailed email he sent me regarding a fighter I was with detailing what he saw as that fighter's limitations and how he would fix them- he fundamentally misunderstands some things about stance and weight distribution and transfer. I think that all of these things are visible in the fighter. I don't think that the change is going to make a difference; you aren't going to make any changes in a short term situation, even in the best of circumstances, and I don't think that Spence will do any sparring beyond the bare minimum for this fight. If offered, I would take the payday but I wouldn't quit my job because it is not a career positive.
    This is it. Spence's style has a limited shelf life and he knows he may have gone past his expiry date and so now more than ever the rest of his career is about paydays. The rematch is by far the biggest payday he can get at 154. If he loses he's only still lost to one guy and is marketable to some extent at 154 having banked the rematch money. If he takes a tuneup he could easily look shot and nobody wants to see the rematch. So he's going to do the rematch.

    Crawford's thinking won't be too dissimilar either. He is apparently not going to be around much longer and the rematch is the biggest cheque at 154 and could/should be another easy night's work for him. He's then an established name at 154 and unbeaten and may have improved his box office power with two defeats of Spence. It puts him in the best position he could possibly be in. The rematch works for both of them.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    529
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Spence activates rematch clause.

    The rematch is the price we have to pay for getting the 1st fight

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Klitschko invokes rematch clause officially
    By oakleyno1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-03-2015, 04:18 AM
  2. BAD NEWS: Valuev had a rematch clause in his contract!
    By rjj tszyu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-20-2009, 07:06 PM
  3. The Jones - Calzaghe rematch clause..?
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 10:09 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-10-2008, 09:55 PM
  5. Taylor Pavlik has a rematch clause for 168!
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-14-2007, 05:48 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing