Canelo Álvarez v Jermell Charlo September Thirtieth

[TIC]

i also thought ggg was robbed in the first fight & i had canelo as the underdog entering the first & second fight, which made his win in the second fight that much more impressive to me. it was also a really good fight. my signature just highlights you making up a fact & then contradicting it. if you hadn't of used the word fact or admitted it wasn't a fact i wouldn't have an issue with your statement. most modern fighters chase belts these days & have since the multiple sanctioning bodies introduced all these belts. the times have definitely changed. as for king ry can you blame him or his team for the aggressive marketing? it worked, the tank v king ry fight is one of the biggest pay per views in recent times. king ry may be more interested in posing for instagram than he is in the grind of boxing, he did get in the ring with tank though, he fought the very talented luke campbell & he's coming back after the tank fight against a big punching, rugged fighter next. i could see your point if you were pushing the same perception with guys like jaime munguia or zurdo ramirez & there are others, tank hasn't fought a murderers row himself

My statement stands, and most everyone would agree with me. Saying GGG has fought all his career at MW, and having you dredge up one fight at 163, which isn't even the next division up... doesn't invalidate the spirit of what I was accurately stating. I don't pick on nitpicky details just to win an argument. So my statement still stands. Prior to Ginger dragging GGG up to 168, GGG had fought his entire career at MW. You know what I mean.

Still... I'm flattered by the attention.

your statement that it's a fact is wrong & anyone agreeing with your made up fact would also be wrong. what has been the middleweight limit for professional boxing during ggg's career? what weight division is one sixty three within? i agree with you that ggg fought most of his career at one sixty & i do know what you were meaning, i have no issue with any of that except that you are trying to say it is a fact & you still refuse to admit it is not a fact. i'm only highlighting your mentality & reasoning. as when other discussions between us occur it must always be taken into consideration that you are the type of person who is happy to make up facts & then contradict them & are unable to acknowledge that you have done so

[Master]

Really like the Epilogue episode. I do not know when they started the series but like the fight highlights, summary and post fight interviews.

This version of Canelo seems strong and motivated. Can see him dominating the weight and hope he takes on the best at this weight.

The rest of the smaller challengers are wasting their, his and our time.

[TitoFan]

i also thought ggg was robbed in the first fight & i had canelo as the underdog entering the first & second fight, which made his win in the second fight that much more impressive to me. it was also a really good fight. my signature just highlights you making up a fact & then contradicting it. if you hadn't of used the word fact or admitted it wasn't a fact i wouldn't have an issue with your statement. most modern fighters chase belts these days & have since the multiple sanctioning bodies introduced all these belts. the times have definitely changed. as for king ry can you blame him or his team for the aggressive marketing? it worked, the tank v king ry fight is one of the biggest pay per views in recent times. king ry may be more interested in posing for instagram than he is in the grind of boxing, he did get in the ring with tank though, he fought the very talented luke campbell & he's coming back after the tank fight against a big punching, rugged fighter next. i could see your point if you were pushing the same perception with guys like jaime munguia or zurdo ramirez & there are others, tank hasn't fought a murderers row himself

My statement stands, and most everyone would agree with me. Saying GGG has fought all his career at MW, and having you dredge up one fight at 163, which isn't even the next division up... doesn't invalidate the spirit of what I was accurately stating. I don't pick on nitpicky details just to win an argument. So my statement still stands. Prior to Ginger dragging GGG up to 168, GGG had fought his entire career at MW. You know what I mean.

Still... I'm flattered by the attention.

your statement that it's a fact is wrong & anyone agreeing with your made up fact would also be wrong. what has been the middleweight limit for professional boxing during ggg's career? what weight division is one sixty three within? i agree with you that ggg fought most of his career at one sixty & i do know what you were meaning, i have no issue with any of that except that you are trying to say it is a fact & you still refuse to admit it is not a fact. i'm only highlighting your mentality & reasoning. as when other discussions between us occur it must always be taken into consideration that you are the type of person who is happy to make up facts & then contradict them & are unable to acknowledge that you have done so

Hey bro, it's no biggie.

I'm a big picture type of guy... and my saying GGG had fought MW his entire career before Ginger dragged him up to 168... only to have you "prove me wrong" by finding the one fight where GGG fought at 163... that's not going to prove that I don't know boxing, nor that I... what is it... "make up facts"? I'm certainly not gonna lose any sleep about what continues to be a difference of opinion between you and me.

Again... if it makes you happy to crow that I'm "happy to make up facts"... go for it. All the more power to you. I'll drink to that. It's certainly not worth continuing to argue about.

I said what I said and that's how it stays. It was a dig at Ginger... a fighter we both know you love and I hate. My point was well made... and still stands. I'm not one to care much about the fine print.

Cheers.

[TIC]

i also thought ggg was robbed in the first fight & i had canelo as the underdog entering the first & second fight, which made his win in the second fight that much more impressive to me. it was also a really good fight. my signature just highlights you making up a fact & then contradicting it. if you hadn't of used the word fact or admitted it wasn't a fact i wouldn't have an issue with your statement. most modern fighters chase belts these days & have since the multiple sanctioning bodies introduced all these belts. the times have definitely changed. as for king ry can you blame him or his team for the aggressive marketing? it worked, the tank v king ry fight is one of the biggest pay per views in recent times. king ry may be more interested in posing for instagram than he is in the grind of boxing, he did get in the ring with tank though, he fought the very talented luke campbell & he's coming back after the tank fight against a big punching, rugged fighter next. i could see your point if you were pushing the same perception with guys like jaime munguia or zurdo ramirez & there are others, tank hasn't fought a murderers row himself

My statement stands, and most everyone would agree with me. Saying GGG has fought all his career at MW, and having you dredge up one fight at 163, which isn't even the next division up... doesn't invalidate the spirit of what I was accurately stating. I don't pick on nitpicky details just to win an argument. So my statement still stands. Prior to Ginger dragging GGG up to 168, GGG had fought his entire career at MW. You know what I mean.

Still... I'm flattered by the attention.

your statement that it's a fact is wrong & anyone agreeing with your made up fact would also be wrong. what has been the middleweight limit for professional boxing during ggg's career? what weight division is one sixty three within? i agree with you that ggg fought most of his career at one sixty & i do know what you were meaning, i have no issue with any of that except that you are trying to say it is a fact & you still refuse to admit it is not a fact. i'm only highlighting your mentality & reasoning. as when other discussions between us occur it must always be taken into consideration that you are the type of person who is happy to make up facts & then contradict them & are unable to acknowledge that you have done so

Hey bro, it's no biggie.

I'm a big picture type of guy... and my saying GGG had fought MW his entire career before Ginger dragged him up to 168... only to have you "prove me wrong" by finding the one fight where GGG fought at 163... that's not going to prove that I don't know boxing, nor that I... what is it... "make up facts"? I'm certainly not gonna lose any sleep about what continues to be a difference of opinion between you and me.

Again... if it makes you happy to crow that I'm "happy to make up facts"... go for it. All the more power to you. I'll drink to that. It's certainly not worth continuing to argue about.

I said what I said and that's how it stays. It was a dig at Ginger... a fighter we both know you love and I hate. My point was well made... and still stands. I'm not one to care much about the fine print.

Cheers.

you didn't just say ggg had fought mw his entire career, you claimed it was a fact. my point is not about proving you wrong, it's that you made up a fact & are unable to admit that it wasn't a fact. i've never tried to prove you don't know boxing, i think you enjoy the sport just as much as i do when it's at its best. it's not a difference of opinion. you claimed something was a fact & it wasn't & you can't admit that it wasn't a fact. i have know feelings about it at all, as i said my signature just highlights your mentality & reasoning & your inability to concede. there is no argument. i don't love canelo. i like many things he's done in the sport & dislike many things he has done as well. your claim that it was a fact was wrong, so nothing stands. i care about how words, language & fine print are used. cheers

[TitoFan]

[Spicoli]

I never envisioned a scenario in which Steve flippin Rolls would be as prevalent in fluffing up Canelo in any fashion. Indirectly of course . Brilliant.

[palmerq]

I never envisioned a scenario in which Steve flippin Rolls would be as prevalent in fluffing up Canelo in any fashion. Indirectly of course . Brilliant.

And you Yankees think the Canadians are irrelevant on the world stage.... Check Mate Buddy

[Spicoli]

I never envisioned a scenario in which Steve flippin Rolls would be as prevalent in fluffing up Canelo in any fashion. Indirectly of course . Brilliant.

And you Yankees think the Canadians are irrelevant on the world stage.... Check Mate Buddy

the legend lives on.

[TitoFan]

I never envisioned a scenario in which Steve flippin Rolls would be as prevalent in fluffing up Canelo in any fashion. Indirectly of course . Brilliant.