1973 George Foreman vs 1942 Joe Louis

[TitoFan]

Serious question:

Is this just about Joe Louis? Or is it meant to carry over to other greats from the 30's, 40's, and 50's?

​My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

https://youtu.be/a27vtfAuSyI?si=3auld8tUUiYmttu3

Ok, I got my answer.

You literally copy-pasted what you've posted dozens of times over the last 24 hours.

You did not answer my question.

I'll have to assume you're a troll.

Carry on...

[joe smith]

Serious question:

Is this just about Joe Louis? Or is it meant to carry over to other greats from the 30's, 40's, and 50's?

​My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

https://youtu.be/a27vtfAuSyI?si=3auld8tUUiYmttu3

Ok, I got my answer.

You literally copy-pasted what you've posted dozens of times over the last 24 hours.

You did not answer my question.

I'll have to assume you're a troll.

Carry on...

How am I trolling by proving I'm right you're not sane, I'm here to show the truth I'm not sorry that hurts you you've shown you're scared just like others like you to watch video cause it hurts seeing the truth

Where's you're proof showing the louis era were as advanced as guys in my video? Provide that since I'm a so called troll looks like novices compared to 70s-90s the video clearly shows those eras were way more advanced

[Master]

Joe Louis had the highest number of defences ever and that was interrupted by World War 2. Saying he would not land punches against George Foreman, who was not the most elusive fighter, is disrespectful.

Louis was the best in his era and technically as good as any boxer in history.

[joe smith]

Joe Louis had the highest number of defences ever and that was interrupted by World War 2. Saying he would not land punches against George Foreman, who was not the most elusive fighter, is disrespectful.

Louis was the best in his era and technically as good as any boxer in history.

My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on the foreman or people he fought?
He and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era was novice-like compared to angles, tech, fluidity, timing, and defense and they fought really dumb a lot of times, standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them.

I specifically chose no names to show that even those guys were way more advanced than the whole Louis era.
So where is the disrespect? Where is your proof Louis could deal with somebody like Foreman yet never facing anybody like him?,technical as good lie cause i could show even way more boxers way more advanced than he ever was just like that video shows

[Master]

Your video is stupid. How can you compare 2 videos side to side and say this is how Joe would react to George?

Louis fought and disposed big, powerful and slow heavyweights just like Foreman.

If boxing is advanced then why stop at the 90's? What happened after that?

[joe smith]

Your video is stupid. How can you compare 2 videos side to side and say this is how Joe would react to George?

Louis fought and disposed big, powerful, and slow heavyweights just like Foreman.

If boxing is advanced then why stop at the 90's? What happened after that?

Just like foreman...... Lie you're a lunatic exposed you lied saying joe was as advanced yet he wasn't or was any of the people he fought they look like novices compared just as my video shows to guys in 70-90s

so how is my video stupid showing how each era fought you liar, Joe never fought anybody like foreman no one had his style of fighting or strength or skill level so where did you get that from?, you have no proof whatsoever that Joe or anybody from his era could deal with those guys in my video let alone foreman who himself showed he was way more advanced in both ages than the whole Louis era

And yeah boxing kept advancing after 90s you liar

[Master]

Foreman was strong but limited boxer who did not know how to pace himself and was over reliant on his punch power. Ali exposed him in front of millions watching.

[Denilson3.0]

@joe smith

Took me hours to write that you sonofB.

I was up till the early hours. All that work and I just checked your previous posts and realized you've been banned.



I mean I'm pretty sure you're still lurking here. But man. What did you do ? O sh*t you can't respond you've been banned (lol)