it reads that wayOriginally Posted by Master
That is strict liability?sounds like common sense right. not for the wbc, their rule requires a need for them to prove "intentional ingestion" of a ped by a boxer
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 5
Likes: 35
Dislikes: 0
larry's daddy
Array
Re: Another example of WBC incompetence/corruption
it reads that wayThat is strict liability?sounds like common sense right. not for the wbc, their rule requires a need for them to prove "intentional ingestion" of a ped by a boxer
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks