Quote Originally Posted by Starr
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote Originally Posted by Starr
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Judging from Briggs last performance IMO, Wladdy would destroy Briggs inside of 5.

Briggs fought with his hands beside him all night, and showed nothing...
if he did nothing then who fucked up Sergei's face
Did you see the fight?
yes

It was boring.

Every shot that Briggs hit Sergei with hurth im though. Sergei had a pretty bruised up face after the fight

Of course if Briggs fought like that against Wlad it would be an early night for him.

He better look impressivei n his first defense or he is no future in the Heavyweight division.

So he should fight Ray Austin or Sultan Ibragimov and knock them out in devastating fashion.

Then he has legitimacy. Until then he's always a question mark.

People who say Shannon looked S*** against Lyakovich and say the entire fight sucked(until the last minute) I agree.

But if Calvin Brock is even competitive with someone like Wladimer all I see is people saying "See that, Wladimer had an off night and still knocked that guy out!"

I don't hear that at all for Briggs.

Well anyway.. it doesn't surprise me.

But here's something I'm mad at(yes..me mad..its a shocker isn't it)

For the Hopkins vs. Eastman fight(which I rewatched today)

Lampley and all of them were giving kudos to Bernard for his safety first style and still being able to pick off the opponent. Larry Merchant and Jim Lampley even said "Bernard is so great that you eliminate the crowd element and still dominate your opponent and be marketable if you're that good. He's that good!"

Mayweather does it against Baldomir and they say "True champions stay and trade and knockout their opponents."

STFU!!
That's just because Mayweather wouldn't put Merchant or Lampley on the payroll.