Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  17
Likes Likes:  122
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 336

Thread: Who is next for Canelo?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    11,771
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    480
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post

    what offer did dmitry's team send canelo for a fight at super middle again? only dmitry turned down an offer
    B.S. It is well documented that Canelo wanted another shot at 175, while Bivol said he'd only fight him again at 168. I guess Canelo wanted to get that embarrassment off his record, while Bivol wanted to prove he could kick Canelo's ass at any weight. It didn't happen. Case closed.


    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post

    artur was at light heavy. i'm not going to lie that's a tough fight. my question would be why would you want the smaller man canelo to fight artur before dmitry did?
    Why not? Presumably Canelo is the guy who wants all the challenges. Why avoid Beterbiev like the plague (like he's doing with Benavidez now), and yet target bigger guys at cruiserweight?

    Cherry-Picking 101: Prof. Alvarez


    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post

    ilunga was the original target but he had a mandatory to fulfill, so don king got that done quick smart, unfortunately canelo had moved on, he then came back to badou after his victory. what weight division is 180 in again? the cruiserweight limit also used to be 190 & the wbc was going to reduce it back down due to their bridgerweight division but they haven't enforced that up to this time

    This is all so freaking desperate. LMFAO. It doesn't MATTER what weight division 180 is in. It doesn't MATTER that cruiserweight used to be 190. I don't GIVE a damn about the bridgerweight division. All your verbal gymnastics can't get Canelo off the hook for being a little bitch and selectively pick out non-threatening targets to collect his meaningless trinkets.

    But please continue. This is the most fun I've had raking Canelo over the coals since I've been here.


    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post

    But this defense of Canelo wanting to fight for a "cruiserweight" title, at the expense of wanting to weight drain a Badou Jack who was just going about his business and probably doesn't give three shits about Canelo... while also instituting his usual diva rehydration clauses...

    I'm honestly thankful that a Canelo fan is trying to defend and justify this ridiculous travesty. All it does is put a magnifying glass on the whole thing, and points out just how Canelo views trinkets.

    He's got no intention of staying at cruiser, just like he's never had any intention of staying at 175. He just wants to collect meaningless, artificially achieved weight titles... so he can crow about being a champion at all these weights.

    I wouldn't put it past Canelo to reach out to a weak HW champ... drain the crap out of him to some ridiculous catchweight.... and then have the nerve to call himself a heavyweight champion.
    what weight division would a fight at 180 be in? i see nothing wrong with a smaller fighter proposing a guy who weighed 32 pounds more in his previous fight to drop 20 pounds. canelo was going to come up 12 pounds. if badou countered maybe they could have meet in the middle

    trinkets are worthless to us but they hold some sway in the sport. adrien broner can always fall back on being a four division champion for example. the title didn't matter to me but canelo challenging a guy at 180 intrigued me

    bring on manuel charr, i'd watch canelo fight him & whatever we may think of trinkets it'll be recorded by history

    The bolded part still applies.

    The whole thing is embarrassing. LMFAO

    Canelo has made a frigging bitch ass clown of himself by asking a 200-pound cruiserweight (who honestly has ZERO interest in fighting Canelo) to drain himself to 180 (with rehydration clauses, of course), so they can fight for a BOGUS cruiserweight title. A title Canelo would have NO INTENTIONS of defending against a full-sized cruiser who weighed in at 200 and rehydrated a few pounds over that.

    The redheaded bitch does not BELONG at cruiser!!! Hell... he got his ass kicked at 175. Be content with your 168 titles and STFU, for crying out loud. He does all these weight gymnastics, and STILL MANAGES TO AVOID THE 168-POUND ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!!!!! Until the elephant got tired of waiting for the bitch and moved on.

    THAT... will be part of Ginger's legacy when he's gone. A cherry-picking, trinket-grabbing coward.
    so no offer from dmitry’s team for a fight at super middle? canelo offered same terms, dmitry turned down the offer

    artur & amitry along with other light heavies should have been fighting each other before canelo needs to. if you’re claiming canelo ducked artur then dmitry has up to this point as well

    it does matter what weight division 180 is in because you keep bringing up the meaningless trinket. still waiting for your answer

    i was just pointing out that the cruiserweight limit used to be 190 & the wbc had planned to reduce in back when they introduced their bridgerweight division. badou may be non-threatening to you but he has always been in fun fights for me & he earned his trinket in the ring, a trinket that would be on the line because what weight division is 180 in again?

    you may consider the title to be bogus but it would be fought for within the division weight limits. who said canelo had intentions to defend it? other fighters haven’t intended to defend titles before, this is nothing new

    you seem overly emotional. he’s just a boxer. go outside & get some sun & fresh air. you are one of these guys that says it’s unfair for jermell to move up 14 pounds to fight canelo saying it’s too much but then complaining when canelo proposes to move up 12 pounds when already in his fifth weight division against a guy that was 32 pounds heavier than him in their previous fights

    since you see no issue with canelo fighting someone 32 pounds above him, you should have no issues with terence crawford moving straight up from welter to fight canelo at super middle or for naoya inoue to move up from super bantam to fight tank at lightweight. no double standards now

    canelo will be a first ballot hall of famer. fact

    one other question I would ask you. do you consider dmitry a pound for pound top ten guy currently?
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Emotional?

    LMAO... you don't know me well enough to make that assertion. I can tell you though, that I've never had this much fun raking Canelo over the coals. To watch you desperately trying to mount a defense of the redheaded bitch's pathetic moves is priceless.

    Hall of Fame or not, he will leave with more than a few haters who have seen through his carefully constructed career like I have.

    If anyone's emotional, it's you... who seem unable to come to grips with the fact that not everyone fawns over Canelo like you do. Tsk-tsk.... such is life.

    Then again, you're a PrincessRy fan too, which gives me all the insight I need as to your tastes in boxing, and what you consider greatness.

    It seems to matter a great deal to you that I don't share your fanboyhood of Canelo. Sorry... can't help you there. But thanks again for trying to mount a comical defense for Canelo avoiding Beterbiev, chasing after Badou trying to starve him to 180, ducking Benavidez, and basically revealing himself to be the bitch ass clown many people know he is.

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    11,771
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    480
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Emotional?

    LMAO... you don't know me well enough to make that assertion. I can tell you though, that I've never had this much fun raking Canelo over the coals. To watch you desperately trying to mount a defense of the redheaded bitch's pathetic moves is priceless.

    Hall of Fame or not, he will leave with more than a few haters who have seen through his carefully constructed career like I have.

    If anyone's emotional, it's you... who seem unable to come to grips with the fact that not everyone fawns over Canelo like you do. Tsk-tsk.... such is life.

    Then again, you're a PrincessRy fan too, which gives me all the insight I need as to your tastes in boxing, and what you consider greatness.

    It seems to matter a great deal to you that I don't share your fanboyhood of Canelo. Sorry... can't help you there. But thanks again for trying to mount a comical defense for Canelo avoiding Beterbiev, chasing after Badou trying to starve him to 180, ducking Benavidez, and basically revealing himself to be the bitch ass clown many people know he is.

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.
    i can see how canelo gets under your skin. for someone you despise so much you sure talk about him a lot. you can just ignore him but you're unable to because you're emotionally involved. there's no desperation, i just disagree with your exaggeration, hyperbole & double standards

    once you reach a cetrain level you'll always receive criticism

    there's no emotion involved for me i just highlight your exaggeration, hyperbole & double standards

    i used to be a king ry fan but after testing positive for peds i'll have to see where he goes, i've never said king ry was great

    it doesn't matter to me what you think of canelo i just highlight your exaggeration, hyperbole & double standards. i don't know the guy & i've even said to you previously that i'd be disappointed if he doesn't fight david b before he retires. unlike yourself i can be reasonable. if anyone's avoided artur it's dmitry. canelo didn't chase badou he propsed a fight & then moved on. hopefully we'll get the david b fight in the near future. canelo's fought a who's who of this era & will be a first ballot hall of famer
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Uttar Pradesh, India
    Posts
    5,763
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Emotional?

    LMAO... you don't know me well enough to make that assertion. I can tell you though, that I've never had this much fun raking Canelo over the coals. To watch you desperately trying to mount a defense of the redheaded bitch's pathetic moves is priceless.

    Hall of Fame or not, he will leave with more than a few haters who have seen through his carefully constructed career like I have.

    If anyone's emotional, it's you... who seem unable to come to grips with the fact that not everyone fawns over Canelo like you do. Tsk-tsk.... such is life.

    Then again, you're a PrincessRy fan too, which gives me all the insight I need as to your tastes in boxing, and what you consider greatness.

    It seems to matter a great deal to you that I don't share your fanboyhood of Canelo. Sorry... can't help you there. But thanks again for trying to mount a comical defense for Canelo avoiding Beterbiev, chasing after Badou trying to starve him to 180, ducking Benavidez, and basically revealing himself to be the bitch ass clown many people know he is.

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.
    "Bitch ass clown" I did ultimately choose as well. I'd gone with"red-headed bitch" til the early evening, then the clear choice came into view. Something about"red-headed bitch" reminded me more of the golden boy 😆😆😆

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.
    "Bitch ass clown" I did ultimately choose as well. I'd gone with"red-headed bitch" til the early evening, then the clear choice came into view. Something about"red-headed bitch" reminded me more of the golden boy 😆😆😆

    "Bitch ass clown" is short and sweet and just seems to roll off the tongue. But it lacks descriptive words like "ducking", "trinket-grabbing", "coddled", etc. "Bitch ass clown" isn't bad, though. It even lends itself to acronym use. BAC. Saves on typing time, if anything. What do you think?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Uttar Pradesh, India
    Posts
    5,763
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.
    "Bitch ass clown" I did ultimately choose as well. I'd gone with"red-headed bitch" til the early evening, then the clear choice came into view. Something about"red-headed bitch" reminded me more of the golden boy 😆😆😆

    "Bitch ass clown" is short and sweet and just seems to roll off the tongue. But it lacks descriptive words like "ducking", "trinket-grabbing", "coddled", etc. "Bitch ass clown" isn't bad, though. It even lends itself to acronym use. BAC. Saves on typing time, if anything. What do you think?

    Bitch ass clown definitely has a kind of triple combo effect, like a jab, a straight right and a follow-up left hook. Bang Bang Bang. No need for any hyphens either. Whereas red-headed bitch is a pain in the ass to type and has more syllables.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post

    BTW, @NoSavingByTheBell I personally think "bitch ass clown" has more oomph. LOL.
    "Bitch ass clown" I did ultimately choose as well. I'd gone with"red-headed bitch" til the early evening, then the clear choice came into view. Something about"red-headed bitch" reminded me more of the golden boy 😆😆😆

    "Bitch ass clown" is short and sweet and just seems to roll off the tongue. But it lacks descriptive words like "ducking", "trinket-grabbing", "coddled", etc. "Bitch ass clown" isn't bad, though. It even lends itself to acronym use. BAC. Saves on typing time, if anything. What do you think?

    Bitch ass clown definitely has a kind of triple combo effect, like a jab, a straight right and a follow-up left hook. Bang Bang Bang. No need for any hyphens either. Whereas red-headed bitch is a pain in the ass to type and has more syllables.

    I like how you made this about boxing. Jab, straight right, and follow-up left hook indeed...

    I can picture it in my mind. Maybe something David B would say as he's using that same combo on Ginger. "Bitch"... POW!... "ass"... POW!... "clown"... POW! "And this is what you get for avoiding me so much and making me wait!!"

    Yeah. Less syllables. BAC are all one-syllable words. Flows right off the tongue.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    11,771
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    480
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is next for Canelo?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
    you don't use logic you use exaggerations, hyperbole & double standards

    why would i be offended by words?

    bye

    Coming from you, your words don't mean jackshit. You're tolerated here for some strange reason, and have been given more than your fair share of rope by some of the more forgiving mods on here. But don't take that to mean you won't get back what you're dishing in super-sized portions.
    so you're against free speech & happy for others to be censored? the mods allowed other members to make threats of physical violence against other members & one mod & another member were giving out medical advice so it would be hypocritical of them to worry about my words & questions

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post

    why would i be offended by words?


    But back to Canelo.

    Do I take it then that you wouldn't be interested in participating in a new thread trying to come up with new nicknames for Canelo?
    i'm good with canelo but you do you
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How is Canelo a top P4P guy?
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-23-2016, 01:36 AM
  2. Canelo vs. GGG
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-21-2015, 01:25 AM
  3. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 12-15-2013, 09:34 PM
  4. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-08-2013, 06:22 PM
  5. Why Canelo will win.....
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-04-2013, 03:16 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing