The Nasty Weather Thread

[TitoFan]

Hey guys, leave TIC alone.

He equates one data point with a whole trend. Rock on, dude.

as usual you are missing the point. spicoli mentioned new record highs. that year book was officially authorized by the government. did you google what the hottest day in australia was? so the question is were the government lying back then or is someone lying now? did you see the spock thing? were the "climate experts" lying then?

Whose point? Your point? That's not unusual. I'm sure I miss your point lots of times.

Lying... lying... lying. What is your fixation with lying?

The point IS... that more than sufficient data exists that global temperatures are slowly trending up. In any data field there are going to be outliers. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of statistics is going to realize that. The fact that snow fell in Florida does not automatically disprove the notion of global warming. I would get into a serious discussion with you about data... but I doubt you will honestly make an effort to understand it.

Global warming data isn't meant for "the sky is falling" reactions. It's just data. Plain and simple. Why on earth would anyone lie about global temperature data? What does anyone have to gain by it? Global warming is global warming... and climate change is climate change. Unless you're a university taught climatologist, I don't think any of us here are certified experts on climate. We can speculate. We can theorize. But none of us here are experts. We have to go by what the available data says. Of course, unless we're naturally skeptical about EVERYTHING... and can't bring ourselves to accept data at face value. Problem with that approach is, you have to counter it with something. Saying: "I don't believe it. Nyah-nyah-nah-nah-nah" just isn't going to cut it.

[TIC]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

[TitoFan]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

If you don't believe in data now... what good would it do to check data ten years from now?

Unless of course you're planning to put your "verify it for yourself" mantra, and go around the world placing your own temperature probes across the planet.

Let us know how that works out.

[TIC]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

If you don't believe in data now... what good would it do to check data ten years from now?

Unless of course you're planning to put your "verify it for yourself" mantra, and go around the world placing your own temperature probes across the planet.

Let us know how that works out.

i didn't say to check data, let's check back in ten years to see what the narrative is on global warming

[TitoFan]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

If you don't believe in data now... what good would it do to check data ten years from now?

Unless of course you're planning to put your "verify it for yourself" mantra, and go around the world placing your own temperature probes across the planet.

Let us know how that works out.

i didn't say to check data, let's check back in ten years to see what the narrative is on global warming

The narrative?

Well... I suppose that would depend on what the data says, now wouldn't it.
Try to keep up, sport.

[TIC]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

If you don't believe in data now... what good would it do to check data ten years from now?

Unless of course you're planning to put your "verify it for yourself" mantra, and go around the world placing your own temperature probes across the planet.

Let us know how that works out.

i didn't say to check data, let's check back in ten years to see what the narrative is on global warming

The narrative?

Well... I suppose that would depend on what the data says, now wouldn't it.
Try to keep up, sport.

i've already shown you two sets of data differing. the narrative is the story being told. i predict in ten years the story being told is that global warming is no longer an issue. care to make a prediction?

[TitoFan]

... and I already thought you were quite the moron.

I would get into a serious discussion with you

you can't have a serious discission with someone who throws out personal attacks & makes up their own facts. data is not reality. i just showed you two different sets of data, one set was good enough to be officially used by the government until nineteen sixty & instead of keeping the old official data it is now being scrub & replaced with more recent data, spock was touted climate experts "believing" the next ice age was on it's way. who were these climate experts & what data was he referencing at that time?

let's check back in ten years & see how global warming is going

If you don't believe in data now... what good would it do to check data ten years from now?

Unless of course you're planning to put your "verify it for yourself" mantra, and go around the world placing your own temperature probes across the planet.

Let us know how that works out.

i didn't say to check data, let's check back in ten years to see what the narrative is on global warming

The narrative?

Well... I suppose that would depend on what the data says, now wouldn't it.
Try to keep up, sport.

i've already shown you two sets of data differing. the narrative is the story being told. i predict in ten years the story being told is that global warming is no longer an issue. care to make a prediction?

Global warming may not be an issue. Depends on what the data says.