Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  7
Likes Likes:  5
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: How do you rank the Four Kings?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2025
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    48
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    Fantastic replies—great detail and thought put in. My rankings:

    Favorites: Hearns, Leonard, Hagler, Duran.
    Performances against each other: Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Duran.
    All-time great ranking: Duran, Leonard, Hagler, Hearns.

    Having Hearns at #4 for both TitoFan and me doesn’t feel right, but there’s no wrong answer—you can make a strong case for any order. TitoFan also makes a great point about Benitez. He had competitive fights with three of the Four Kings and likely would’ve faced Hagler had he beaten Mustafa Hamsho.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    Thomas Hitman Hearns is so underrated and unappreciated that it is almost criminal.

    Hearns was a boxing miracle. He was so tall for his weight that it was unbelievable how he made the weight. Ray Leonard crapped himself when he saw Tommy after the weigh in.

    Tommy had the longest reach, blinding hand speed and the highest level of boxing skills known to man. The hit man's right hand was a gift from the gods and when it landed it knocked out his opponent cold. Ask Duran who was brutally dispatched like no one has ever done to him before.

    Hearns had the misfortune of meeting Sugar Ray who was getting out boxed and had the fight been 12 rounds would have won the contest.

    Tommy landed that right hand on Hagler, but Marvin had a freakishly strong chin that he somehow took the punch and went on to win. No one else in history could have survived that brutal onslaught that Hitman rained on the Marvelous one.

    Most of all Tommy brought excitement and entertainment into a contest. You knew you were going to get action when he was involved in a contest. Tommy is the best of the four kings for that alone.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    562
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    309
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    My personal favourite is Thomas Hitman Hearns, just a frightening, aggressive, skilled, all action puncher. He had it all and is the p4p best of them all as he went up the weights with even more success than Duran.

    I only became a Hagler fan after he retired and watched his boxing 1970's matches on ESPN where he was a speedy skilled southpaw who fought top contenders in their back yard. He took over 2nd place from Roberto Duran for me.

    Duran was the greatest lightweight, (Sweat Pea would run him close) and how he beat Leonard was truly a phenomenal achievement. He then went on to beat undefeated Moore and Barkley were miracles. An all time great.

    Never liked Leonard, he had the silver spoon, red carpet treatment who was the glamour boy. However he is probably the 2nd best welterweight of all time behind the real Sugar Ray by beating Hearns and Duran after that loss.

    Favourite order
    1. Hearns
    2. Hagler
    3. Duran
    4. Leonard

    Performances against each
    1. Leonard but drew against Hagler
    2. Hagler
    3. Hearns beat Leonard in the rematch
    4. Duran way out of his best weight

    All Time Great (ATG)
    1. Duran
    2. Hearns
    3. Leonard
    4. Hagler
    I reckon it was probably John Lennon, then Paul, then George and last Ringo

    Na. For me? HAGLER

    • Arguably only lost once.
    • Only once knocked down, sloppily.
    • Never close to being knocked out or even hurt.
    • Didn’t play around with weight.

    And the biggest thing that swings it for me was Hagler was the only one of the four who left the sport with dignity, that is he was only one of the four who left the sport when he was on top. The other three had fights way best their past, they chased the money and glory and thus lost to fighters that didn't even deserve to be in the same ring as them.

    Hagler didn't do that. Lost a very close UD to SRL and then called it day and never came back. I love that

    Number 2 would be Duran - First of all, his longevity. The guy turned pro 5 years before Hagler, and almost an entire decade prior to Leonard and Hearns. Yet he was killing guy after guy after throughout the 70's. His victory over Leonard is the best win of all time (imo) as I've explained here. Can anyone here imagine if Hagler, Hearns and Leonard had been natural lightweights or welters and moved up to fight a naturally prime Roberto Duran at Middleweight ? Destruction

    Number 3 would SRL
    Number 4 would be Hearns

    But honestly ? I'll probably wake up tomorrow and totally rearrange the order as the margins are razor thin
    Last edited by Denilson3.0; 03-18-2025 at 04:50 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    11,813
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    486
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    atg ray, roberto, marvin, tommy
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,094
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    I think it is pretty much understood and decided that the correct order is:
    Leonard
    Hagler
    Hearns
    Duran...

    Also, why do we always neglect Benitez in this discussion all the time? He beat Duran and took Hearns to a SD. He should get more respect. Should really be the 5 Kings.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2025
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    48
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How do you rank the Four Kings?

    ykdadamaja, based on the replies so far (unofficial as they may be), Duran is seen as the greatest, with Leonard and Hagler tied for second. But as I said, there’s no wrong answer. TitoFan made a great point bringing up Benitez—he deserves recognition as the 5th King.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Other Four Kings
    By holmcall in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-24-2021, 09:30 AM
  2. The Kings Of Welterweights!!
    By the-anton-bomb in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-18-2008, 06:18 PM
  3. Kings Of Leon
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-22-2007, 07:25 AM
  4. Gypsy kings
    By KickboxAmob in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-30-2006, 11:54 PM
  5. When We were Kings
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 01:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing