Quote Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
Quote Originally Posted by tuckwopat
Quote Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
Quote Originally Posted by tuckwopat
Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote Originally Posted by tuckwopat
I think Wlad is good, but overrated in the grand scheme of boxing.
Not really. Look at the rest of the division...right now...Wlad is "the grand scheme of boxing" as you say.

He's the most talented of the bunch & he's been proving & improving himself since his loss to Brewster.

Quote Originally Posted by tuckwopat
People being convinced that Baldomir might beat Floyd makes him overrated.
Disagree again. Baldomir was undefeated in 19 fights also...nothing overrated about a man that keeps on winning...even though he just lost his last fight.
Grand Scheme meant all of boxing. To say if he were a smaller fighter, he wouldn't get by on boxing ability.

Being undefeated is great, depending on who you fight. I once fought a class of 3rd graders and wiped'em out. (But does that make me a great fighter?)
How did he win the Olympic gold medal when boxing ability is how you score points?He wasn't knocking everbody out, he was boxing.
Hell, don't ask me how he did that on his mediocre skills. Crazier things have happened, I guess. Maybe he just took some slow and methodical pills when he became a pro.

Jokes aside, I think he's the best heavyweight currently fighting, and I like him as a fighter. I just like a little sizzle with my steak and he's slow to bring it.
Slow??Compared to who??Even one of Tysons trainers said he threw his right faster than Tyson ever did.
I was actually refering to general ring movement. But whoever that trainer is, is wrong. That's if he's speaking about a prime Tyson. I don't even feel like humoring that. Tyson's prime hand speed and fighting speed was something special. Wlad and Vitali, well they're good fighters. They aren't ordinary fighters, they're oddly square yet effective.