
Originally Posted by
Maverick
Thanx for the article, and yea Taylor is more "high-profile" than Wright, but HBO marketing has much to do with that. I see it like this. I don't care if a fighter is 75-0. If another fighter crawls from under a rock and takes you 12 rounds to a draw... to me there are now 2 guys at #1, so a 50%/50% cut is well deserved, and Taylor should actually agree to it. At this point, neither fighter is better than the other. It was a draw.
I understand what you are saying but the fact is that the money for the fighters purses comes as a result of ticket sales and ppv buys and if one fighter is responsible for generating more interest than the other in terms of tickets and ppv it is also fair that he gets the lion share.
Taylor is a bigger draw than Winky who although an excellent technical figher doesnt really have a crowd pleasing entertaining style. I can't even remember the last time Winky knocked a guy out, in fact if it wasn't for the fact that boxrec tells me so I might even have believed it if you told me he had never knocked anyone out in his career!
Taylor, despite the two technical chess matches against Hopkins is an exciting boxer to watch and is simply more marketable than Winky.
You can argue that as they are both evenly matched in terms of skill they should be paid the same but you can just as easily argue that since Jermain is better in terms of marketability and generating both fighters income then he should get the majority of it.
I happen to agree with the latter statement.
Winky wants 50% whilst he will probably only bring 30% of the ppv buys, Taylor will generate the other 70% so why should he give up another 20% of it to Winky?
He shouldnt.
Bookmarks