Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB
being the best P4P doesn't mean getting shrunk or made bigger... it's who who has the best skills and can apply them over the biggest range of weight classes.
...
For me any way... we need a clear cut definition really... :P
That's really at the heart of the debate...people have such different concepts of what the p4p label describes.
Skillwise, I'd have to give PBF the top spot - there is little question he has more technical skill than Pacquiao. On the other hand, Pacquiao's resume of late makes PBF's look weak (and yes, this is my opinion).

So how about we come up with a set of criteria for determining the p4p list? Some sort of checklist or point system? It would clear a lot of confusion and ensure that the p4p list isn't a glorified popularity contest.

Oh yeah - I pretty much agree with that list. I'd probably make a few changes, personally, but I can easily agree with it as it stands. Thanks for the hard work going into putting it together!