Quote Originally Posted by Smashup
Quote Originally Posted by Steelie
That's the thing,I was perfectly content to give Hatton his props etc etc but it gets annoying when the nut huggers appear. Like I and a few other people have pointed out AND USED examples,Cotto has beaten some good fighters and to so to say he has beaten no one is just plain out ignorance...
No it's not...it's fact.

You won't be drawn on it cos you know that you can't really defend his record with any gusto...

The relevance in the Hatton v Cotto debate is that people are coming on here following this performance against Quintana, claiming Miguel is the new messiah...when in fact, even if we give him the benefit of the doubt, he's still not mixed it a world level.

So, how can people be saying he beats anyone after beating Quintana?

Yes he looked comfortable at the weight and yes he put on a good performance but did anyone expect anything less?

A 'W' against Quitana tells us nothing we didn't already know and even less about what might happen against Hatton.























He's spot on people.
Miguel is yet to prove sh*t to me as well.
Who has he fought of any real substance?
Quintana is by no means a 'judging stick' for anyone and retired on his stool at the end of the day
Fact is that Cotto has yet to be really tested.


So as a measuring stick would you say that Hatton could beat Quintana so convincingly? Don't be so quick to write off Quintana, he still has a role to play in the WW division, the boy has skills.