look here...your all over the place you have no exact point...you say this but don't get into another...ok say em is shot...but look at how chico perform at his last fight...make morales your point pac beat him because he was shot...ok that's your oppinion...well morales beat pac the first time...why? because pac was one demensional even you will admit that...now did pac look one demensional against larios valezquez and the second and third fight with em...so yes em was a example of pacs improvement..stay on track with what the hell you talking about kid...

another thing yea I agree...jmm outbox and survived pac the first time...at best he deserved a draw...we can agree to desagree who really won...but you want to talk about facts right...then admit who should of won if not for the error one of the judges made...exactly the young one demensional pac should of got the s.d win over the great counter boxer jmm...but look jmm went through hell with the young pac then...todays pac is much different you have to admit...and look what's different with jmm...his brawling a lot now...and that is what pac does best...he can't do that against pac...

hell yea pac deserves credit...his first come up on 126 he destroyed mab...okay say mab was not focus...well you gotta admit pac had as much distraction coming into the fight against em 1...and in the jmm fight...look making excuses is one thing but if you say this is why pac beat em is because em is shot and mab was unfocus distracted blah blah blah...you can say that but be fair to pac and consider why maybe he lost...and another thing pac came up at 130 guess who it was...it was em he fought first...so you say larios a smaller guy then pac rock pac...well watch first round of pac em 1...em was hurt by pac by a body shot...since you bash pac and gave credit to larios for hurting pac why don't you bash em and credit pac because pac by your oppinion when a fighter first moves up his a smaller guy then the guy his fighting...so what's the different...ooh morales wasn't shot yet then huh since he won...ohh then when he loses his a shot fighter and the fighter that beat him doesn't get credit for that...well back to what you said...about jumping banagons...well I guess when a fighter lose his shot and forget him right?...yea that's same thing they said about mab everyone jump of his wagon when he got pounded by pac and everyone said he was shot...but now he has been winning? hmm.

me personally I hate hearing excuses...you win or you lose...

bottom line is not that pac is going up in weight and is gonna k.o everyone...

this is about chico...I say pac beats him because...of the you only as good as your last fight factor...so its you that's blowing this up...pac comes in about 144 that's not far from chico...pac is not as small as you think...if you say chico is too big too strong well its you falling for what the hell your trying to point out about...being carried away with what they thin ...and no I didn't say larios got taller I said his taller and bigger then pac when they fought.

anyways everyone said pac was to small when he came up to 130 he was rushing in at 126 because he is fighting mab...blah blha blah...