Quote Originally Posted by TheBESTP4P
Quote Originally Posted by Gyrokai
For anybody who says Floyd and Winky are entertaining... even Hopkins. (Well Hopkins is running on his past performances which were VERY thrilling.)

Have you seen any of them fight live? Are they "entertaining" enough for you to buy tickets and take the time to see them live?


heh, If you have, then your like a rare specimen.

C'mon man, I'm calling every fan out! Who thinks these guys are entertaining.
Have you seen them live! Would you take the time. haha

With Erik Morales, *Barrera, and Manny Pacquiao... I would.... but then again they are, for the most part, entertaining.




*Only entertaining when fighting someone Great.
ive always KNOCKED B-HOP for being boring as Fukkkkkk. not my cup of tea at all. u wanna know how boring he was? i had PIMP seats to B-Hop vs JT II(like many fights i made a chick buy me tickets) and i didnt even go or use them or sell them and i came up here to the great white northwest to look over my businesses instead.

however to keep it REAL i do give him props for defeating Tarver tho and even how he carried himself in the conferences before and after really impressed me.

one thing that B-HOP did differently from the Tarver fight than the JT fights was he actually did shiiiiit in the first 6 rounds in fact he brought it from bell to bell. where as in the JT fights he didnt do SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT for the first 6-7rounds. yet all the B-HOP WACKOS(no pun intended) thought he actually clearly won.
Yo man, I say which fighters are entertaining, and I back it up by taking the time to watch them live and appreciate the little time I have with their performances.

Bernard could have KO'd Tarver, but he didn't because "theze dayz" going for the knockout is considered "bad boxing."