mab is a great fighter and he still is...we give credit to mab for beating em in the third fight and for schooling rocky...but when it comes to pac...theres always an excuse why he wins...I'm a fan of all four great featherweights of this era...(em,mab,jmm and pac)...but people will say I'm more a pac fan...only because I feel I have to defend pac more because he mostly doesn't get no credit and still is bash after all the improvements and hard training his done...still get bash for two k.o lost to unknown fighters...its like saying in third grade tyson use to get whoop by school girls...and still insist those today.wtf, its plain hating to still mention pacs early lost.

where is the credit for pac beating mab...everyone said it was because mab is done blah blah blah...but mab won three in the row after pac beat him?

mab was not focus not prepared...why can't people look at pacs lost the same way...he came way to confident against em...even during the fight roach said not to take em lightly...and with jmm pacs 1 demensional days, why pac doesn't get to make excuses? why with larios everyone says he got rock?...really he did? well that shyt was about a second long so does that mean he was really hurt?...cause all I remember right after that he put more whooping on larios, do u guys remember that? or just still so hopefull pac will loss?

it always happens to great fighters...people wants to see them lose...and there wins are always debated and not appreciated...

as for pac vs mab ll

pac wins in six.