You mean modern pharmacistsOriginally Posted by cockey cockney
You mean modern pharmacistsOriginally Posted by cockey cockney
I'd say take the record as it is. He fought big names who were past their prime, but that wasn't his fault. Past it versions of Louis, Waclott etc wud still have knocked fuck out of the current heavyweight division. He wasn't a great boxer but he definately had great power......which proved enough. Beat everyone there was in his era so he is rightly considered a great bcos we haven't been proved otherwise.Originally Posted by cockey cockney
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
Rock fought fighters in decline, but who else was there.
He was great because he knew when to turn up the heat.
Look at Charles, where he suffered an awful tear of his nose, and then went on in the following round to knock him out before the fight could be stopped.
And against Walcott, getting floored and dominated in the most part of the fight, but coming back to win with his susie Q, easily the best single punch thrown in heavyweight ring history.
Also, i give him a lot of respect for retiring at the time he did and calling it a day, rather than coming back into the ring and suffering, like Louis, Ali and Tyson.
Plus marciano was the same weight as most of his opponents. Put Valuev up against all 300 pounders with skill and see how well he does. Valuev has outweighed all of his opponents. Marciano outweighed a few.
A bunch of honest and insightful comments. once again you guys have impressed me.
He had a slight problem with cuts and if he continued boxing i'd say he'd lose a few to cuts. You also have to keep in mind that in his first amateur fight he was in horrible shape but ended up becoming possibly the most fit heavyweight ever and an injury to his right wrist was supposed to make it impossible for him to be a successful boxer at any weight but he became the (or one of the for you non-believers) hardest hitting boxer in a division where he was constantly at a size disadvantage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks