Quote Originally Posted by bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by IRON
Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him.
you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.
Don't misunderstand me I know he's responsible for the deaths of many many more, my point is he was charged with killing 137 Kurds.

You also have to conclude that if it is right and proper for the Americans to inflict casualties on Iraqi civilians to further their own self interests then surely its hypocrisy to say that Saddam's killings of civilians is more wrong?

At least Saddam was the legal ruler of Iraq and was operating to defend his own rule and government in his own country.

America kills millions of civilians in lands that arn't even theirs.

Saddam authorised the killing of civilians in reponse to an assassination attempt on his life. He was cracking down on terrorism, no different to the Americans, the Jews or anybody else.

How can you say one is evil and wrong wheras the others are doing the necessary thing?

It's all bullshit. Yes Saddam was an evil monster, but SO is George Bush!

In fact Bush is worse because he operates behind this mask of Christian self righteousness when he's most likely a servant of the devil.
he was also charged with the killings of thousands of kurds, but don't what happened with that.
the killings of shias is not a problem to me,almost all those were his own people if not all. But why kill 1 year old kurds. kurds are not arabs so he was not the ruler of kurdistan, north iraq.
i am not stupid i know the trial wasn't fair, but what he did to kurds wasn't fair either. so since i am a kurd myself he can f****** burn in hell.