Who couldve beat Roy

[DaxxKahn]

If you don't agree. You don't know boxing

My favourite quote of all time that one. Many people use it. I think it shows who were prone to throwing their toys out of the pram as a child.

I cant see anyone on the list offered beating Jones to be honest. A combination of being too slow, too small and just not good enough. Thats not to say it couldnt happen so I wont be the one to pretend like thats the case.

...I always thought the same thing...like when you were a kid and your parents had the "Cuase I said so" Answer...always good in a pinch

[DaxxKahn]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

[Violent Demise]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

[DaxxKahn]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

First of all The comment on Hearns was sarcasim!!!!!....Jones had little speed on Hearns!!!!!!!....WATCH HIM FIGHT YOU F'N ASSHOLE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!!!!!!

I THINK MUGABI WOULD HAVE KO'D JONES IF HE CAUGHT HIM...HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO HE BEAT IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH!!!!!

WHY IS IT EVERY F'N TIME SOMEONE ON THESE BOARDS DISAGREE WITH YOU YOU TURN INTO A COMPLETE ASSHOLE? GUESS WHAT YOUR OPINION IS NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS...YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING...MATTER OF FACT THE MORE YOU TALK THE MORE I QUESTION YOUR KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU LEARN ON THE BOARDS!!!!.


FOR ONCE EITHER JUST FUKING DEBATE LIKE A GROWN MAN OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Violent Demise]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

First of all The comment on Hearns was sarcasim!!!!!....Jones had little speed on Hearns!!!!!!!....WATCH HIM FIGHT YOU F'N ASSHOLE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!!!!!!

I THINK MUGABI WOULD HAVE KO'D JONES IF HE CAUGHT HIM...HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO HE BEAT IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH!!!!!

WHY IS IT EVERY F'N TIME SOMEONE ON THESE BOARDS DISAGREE WITH YOU YOU TURN INTO A COMPLETE ASSHOLE? GUESS WHAT YOUR OPINION IS NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS...YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING...MATTER OF FACT THE MORE YOU TALK THE MORE I QUESTION YOUR KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU LEARN ON THE BOARDS!!!!.


FOR ONCE EITHER JUST FUKING DEBATE LIKE A GROWN MAN OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I see your having a bad night Daxx. Cuz I'm still looking for how I insulted you. Only cuz it's you (and I'm trying to get ready to go out) I'll ignore it. As for your points? Hearns did have good hand speed. At welterweight. At 160 or 168 it was not the same. And it was not in Jones level. As for Mugabi? Answer this question truthfully. Do you really think Mugabi would of caught Jones? Do give me this anything can happen bullshit. If they fought would you put your money on Mugabi or Jones?

[DaxxKahn]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

First of all The comment on Hearns was sarcasim!!!!!....Jones had little speed on Hearns!!!!!!!....WATCH HIM FIGHT YOU F'N ASSHOLE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!!!!!!

I THINK MUGABI WOULD HAVE KO'D JONES IF HE CAUGHT HIM...HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO HE BEAT IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH!!!!!

WHY IS IT EVERY F'N TIME SOMEONE ON THESE BOARDS DISAGREE WITH YOU YOU TURN INTO A COMPLETE ASSHOLE? GUESS WHAT YOUR OPINION IS NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS...YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING...MATTER OF FACT THE MORE YOU TALK THE MORE I QUESTION YOUR KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU LEARN ON THE BOARDS!!!!.


FOR ONCE EITHER JUST FUKING DEBATE LIKE A GROWN MAN OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I see your having a bad night Daxx. Cuz I'm still looking for how I insulted you. Only cuz it's you (and I'm trying to get ready to go out) I'll ignore it. As for your points? Hearns did have good hand speed. At welterweight. At 160 or 168 it was not the same. And it was not in Jones level. As for Mugabi? Answer this question truthfully. Do you really think Mugabi would of caught Jones? Do give me this anything can happen bullshit. If they fought would you put your money on Mugabi or Jones?

Oh your kindness is that of a truly great man......Sometimes you just want to get into it about the dumbest things....Thats why I got mad....you are the only guy I know that can argue with three different guys on one post?

[CityOfGod]

Didnt McClellan beat Jones as an Amatuer ?


Im pretty sure, if a prime McClellan charged at Jones he could KO him inside 3 rounds.

Shiit or Bust as they say.

With regards Roy, i always get the feeling we'll never truly know how good he actually was - how effective he was across the whole spectrum of fighters, boxers & ko artists.

He was awsome & very confident.

Some naysayers comment that his incredible performance was due to his nutritional 'advice' from steroid guru Victor Conte's BALCO LABS.

[Rotten Apple]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

First of all The comment on Hearns was sarcasim!!!!!....Jones had little speed on Hearns!!!!!!!....WATCH HIM FIGHT YOU F'N ASSHOLE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!!!!!!

I THINK MUGABI WOULD HAVE KO'D JONES IF HE CAUGHT HIM...HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO HE BEAT IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH!!!!!

WHY IS IT EVERY F'N TIME SOMEONE ON THESE BOARDS DISAGREE WITH YOU YOU TURN INTO A COMPLETE ASSHOLE? GUESS WHAT YOUR OPINION IS NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS...YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING...MATTER OF FACT THE MORE YOU TALK THE MORE I QUESTION YOUR KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU LEARN ON THE BOARDS!!!!.


FOR ONCE EITHER JUST FUKING DEBATE LIKE A GROWN MAN OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I see your having a bad night Daxx. Cuz I'm still looking for how I insulted you. Only cuz it's you (and I'm trying to get ready to go out) I'll ignore it. As for your points? Hearns did have good hand speed. At welterweight. At 160 or 168 it was not the same. And it was not in Jones level. As for Mugabi? Answer this question truthfully. Do you really think Mugabi would of caught Jones? Do give me this anything can happen bullshit. If they fought would you put your money on Mugabi or Jones?

Oh your kindness is that of a truly great man......Sometimes you just want to get into it about the dumbest things....Thats why I got mad....you are the only guy I know that can argue with three different guys on one post?

I don't know if it's because it's true or not but that line made me laugh. Violent D, he's something else. Despite his arrogance, I actually enjoy reading his posts. I don't know if many people are going to agree with this but if you look past all the nonsence in his posts you'll see that there a lot of good valid points.

[DaxxKahn]

1 Tommy Hearns: Jones hand speed would be give Hearns a lot of problems- Yes because Tommy was known to be a slow fighter
2 Marvin Hagler: It'll be the James Toney fight all over- Except Jones would not keep Hagler on the outside
3 John Mugabi: Terry Norris destroyed him. Jones would to.Pre Hagler I don't know..John hit HARD!!!! and has a great chin
4 Carlos Monzon: Jones on points
5 Juan Roldan: Lets not get carried away Agreed
6 Curtis Parker: This is just stupidAgreed
7 Nigel Benn: Jones shuts him outAgreed
8 Gerald Mclellan: After 3 rounds Mcclellan would get frustratedThis would be a hell of a fight I still say Jones but he would have a hard time
9 Julian Jackson: Jackson would never catch Jones Agreed
10 Hopkins 2 if it ever happened: Hopkins-Jones all overDepends at what point in Hopkins career

What the hell does Hearns being or not being a slow starter got to do with Jones hand speed? Mugabi made his name off a loss to Hagler. He was never an elite fighter. Did he ever beat an elite fighter? He would not of beaten Jones. Agree on Jones-McClellan. It would be tough. As for Jones-Hopkins? I think a prime Jones beats a prime Hopkins any time.

First of all The comment on Hearns was sarcasim!!!!!....Jones had little speed on Hearns!!!!!!!....WATCH HIM FIGHT YOU F'N ASSHOLE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!!!!!!

I THINK MUGABI WOULD HAVE KO'D JONES IF HE CAUGHT HIM...HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO HE BEAT IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH!!!!!

WHY IS IT EVERY F'N TIME SOMEONE ON THESE BOARDS DISAGREE WITH YOU YOU TURN INTO A COMPLETE ASSHOLE? GUESS WHAT YOUR OPINION IS NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS...YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING...MATTER OF FACT THE MORE YOU TALK THE MORE I QUESTION YOUR KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU LEARN ON THE BOARDS!!!!.


FOR ONCE EITHER JUST FUKING DEBATE LIKE A GROWN MAN OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I see your having a bad night Daxx. Cuz I'm still looking for how I insulted you. Only cuz it's you (and I'm trying to get ready to go out) I'll ignore it. As for your points? Hearns did have good hand speed. At welterweight. At 160 or 168 it was not the same. And it was not in Jones level. As for Mugabi? Answer this question truthfully. Do you really think Mugabi would of caught Jones? Do give me this anything can happen bullshit. If they fought would you put your money on Mugabi or Jones?

Oh your kindness is that of a truly great man......Sometimes you just want to get into it about the dumbest things....Thats why I got mad....you are the only guy I know that can argue with three different guys on one post?

I don't know if it's because it's true or not but that line made me laugh. Violent D, he's something else. Despite his arrogance, I actually enjoy reading his posts. I don't know if many people are going to agree with this but if you look past all the nonsence in his posts you'll see that there a lot of good valid points.

I agree 100% VD is a hell of a guy and I love reading his post...Would not be the same without him...Contrary to my out burst he knows his boxing..one of the most knoweldgeabl gys around...Just at times he goes a bit too far when he refuses to let anyone else have a valid point but him....

VD you know I love ya like Laundry baby... :P