Re: Mike Tyson with Cus D'Amota

Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
BIG H
I couldn't call a Prime Holmes Prime Tyson fight, I may lean towards Holmes if it went long. But one thing I do know i that Holmes would NEVER had taken the punches that KOed him at anytime during his career, and was his defence really that shot in 88

well he was 38 had two weeks to train and hadnt fought in 2 years and was on losing streak so you tell me

and at one point in that fight he started dancing and tyson looked confused and young holmes would do that for full distance if your saying that then was mike tysons defence really shot against razor ruddock ?? because to me he looked very good and i dont really see no difference them body shots he hit ruddock with in first fight were devasting and he had headmovement still it was just the way ruddock threw his punches he threw them very akward like uppercuts he threw were akward and strange thats why sometimes when tyson got caught he didnt see it coming because he threw them akward not because tyson was shot or losing his skills
He was still fighting at 50 odd and did well enough aginst Mercer post Tyson 
I get your point and totally agree that the Holmes that fought Tyson was a shadow - and as I said I would lean towards Holmes prime for prime.
God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!
Bookmarks